From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chris Morgan" <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V20 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:42:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727174203.995CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727164815.65190-7-macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Raw reads via `inv_icm42607_read_sensor` do not wait for the first sample to be generated, causing spurious `-EINVAL` errors on wakeup.
- [Low] Passing `unsigned int *` to parameters expecting `enum inv_icm42607_sensor_mode *` causes a compiler warning and potential strict-aliasing violation.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH V20 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607 ---
commit 34b41c497c47a25cee214dea5331f64210422963
Author: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607
Add icm42607 accelerometer sensor for icm42607.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> index e6d2fc7c0a344..22cd37e0616e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -191,6 +202,174 @@ static int inv_icm42607_set_pwr_mgmt0(struct inv_icm42607_state *st,
[ ... ]
> +int inv_icm42607_set_sensor_conf(struct inv_icm42607_state *st,
> + struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf *conf,
> + enum iio_chan_type chan_type)
> +{
> + struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf *oldconf;
> + unsigned int accel_mode, gyro_mode;
> + bool config0, config1;
> + unsigned int val;
> + int ret;
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Since we are only making one-shot calls today, we can avoid needless
> + * on/off cycles if we rely on the runtime power management to handle
> + * shutting off the sensors when not in use. The downside is if we
> + * enable both sensors then only read from one, we have to wait for
> + * runtime PM to turn it off. So just keep the mode of the sensor we
> + * are not actively using to whatever it's already set as.
> + */
> + ret = inv_icm42607_get_pwr_mgmt0(st, &gyro_mode, &accel_mode);
[Severity: Low]
Does this code cause an incompatible pointer type warning?
inv_icm42607_get_pwr_mgmt0() expects enum inv_icm42607_sensor_mode *
parameters, but &gyro_mode and &accel_mode are unsigned int *. Recent kernel
versions (since 6.8) treat this as a build error by default.
[ ... ]
> +int inv_icm42607_read_sensor(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + s16 *val)
> +{
> + struct inv_icm42607_sensor_conf conf = INV_ICM42607_SENSOR_CONF_INIT;
> + struct inv_icm42607_state *st = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
[ ... ]
> + /* enable sensor */
> + conf.mode = sensor_st->power_mode;
> + conf.filter = sensor_st->filter;
> + ret = inv_icm42607_set_sensor_conf(st, &conf, chan->type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* read sensor register data */
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(st->map, reg, &data, sizeof(data));
[Severity: Medium]
Does this sequence need to wait for the first sample to be generated after
powering on the sensor?
It appears that if the sensor is turned on by a userspace read, the driver
waits for the physical hardware startup time in inv_icm42607_set_pwr_mgmt0(),
but doesn't wait for the first sample to be generated based on the configured
ODR (which can take an additional 1/ODR time).
Could reading immediately after power on yield the invalid data marker
(-32768) and return a spurious -EINVAL?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727164815.65190-1-macroalpha82@gmail.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 16:48 [PATCH V20 0/9] Add Invensense ICM42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 1/9] dt-bindings: iio: imu: icm42600: Add mount-matrix Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 2/9] dt-bindings: iio: imu: icm42600: Add icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 3/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add inv_icm42607 Core Driver Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 4/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add SPI For icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 5/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add PM support for icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 17:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer " Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 17:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 7/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Gyroscope to icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 8/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Temp Support in icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-27 17:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 16:48 ` [PATCH V20 9/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add icm42607p IMU for RG-DS Chris Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727174203.995CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macroalpha82@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox