From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add mapping function to pmbus_read_block_data()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:27:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728162749.A42051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728-hwmon-max20826-support-v1-3-224766e0acd1@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Stack buffer overflow in `pmbus_debugfs_block_read` due to unbounded return value from custom `read_block_data` callback.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] TOCTOU data race on PMBus hardware page selection during probe.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add mapping function to pmbus_read_block_data() ---
commit c4bd4d03203a9fd14a7a2bcff69ec842b441fa68
Author: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add mapping function to pmbus_read_block_data()
This commit introduces a mapping function to pmbus_read_block_data() in
preparation for adding support to a device which needs to use its own
read_block implementation.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> index 3d5586c67f840..d697939ec8921 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> @@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ struct pmbus_driver_info {
> int (*read_byte_data)(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg);
> int (*read_word_data)(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int phase,
> int reg);
> + /* size of data_buf is I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 2 */
> + int (*read_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, int page, u8 reg,
> + char *data_buf);
[Severity: High]
Does this API need a size limit parameter? The comment specifies the buffer
size is 34, without providing a limit parameter to the callback, which might
encourage callbacks to return values up to 34.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index 7b58f71985741..ff4572c473b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -678,7 +698,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused pmbus_check_block_register(struct i2c_client *client,
> struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> char data_buf[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 2];
>
> - rv = pmbus_read_block_data(client, page, reg, data_buf);
> + rv = _pmbus_read_block_data(client, page, reg, data_buf);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lead to a race condition with
sysfs accesses during probe?
Looking at pmbus_init_debugfs(), it traverses pages and reads registers
without taking the pmbus_lock. This indirectly invokes pmbus_set_page()
through pmbus_check_block_register():
pmbus_init_debugfs()
pmbus_check_block_register()
_pmbus_read_block_data()
pmbus_read_block_data()
pmbus_set_page()
If userspace reads or writes to a sysfs attribute concurrently, it acquires
the lock and sets the hardware page. Could the lockless call from
pmbus_init_debugfs() interleave between the sysfs thread's pmbus_set_page()
and its subsequent I2C operation, causing the sysfs thread to hit the wrong
PMBus page?
> if (rv >= 0 && !(data->flags & PMBUS_SKIP_STATUS_CHECK))
> rv = pmbus_check_status_cml(client);
[ ... ]
> @@ -3564,7 +3584,7 @@ static ssize_t pmbus_debugfs_block_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> char data[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 2] = { 0 };
>
> scoped_guard(pmbus_lock, client) {
> - rc = pmbus_read_block_data(client, entry->page, entry->reg, data);
> + rc = _pmbus_read_block_data(client, entry->page, entry->reg, data);
> if (rc < 0)
> return rc;
> }
[Severity: High]
Can the new callback return a value large enough to cause an out-of-bounds
write here?
If _pmbus_read_block_data() delegates to the new read_block_data callback,
and that callback returns a size of 34 (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 2) or greater,
would it cause a buffer overflow?
Just below this hunk in pmbus_debugfs_block_read(), the code does:
data[rc] = '\n';
Since the size of the data array is 34, an rc of 34 would write past the end
of the array. Is a bounds check needed on rc before using it as an index?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728-hwmon-max20826-support-v1-0-224766e0acd1@analog.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 16:03 [PATCH 0/5] hwmon: (pmbus) Add support for MAX20826 and similar devices Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: (pmbus/core) fix regulator enable/disable Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-07-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] hwmon: (pmbus/core) increase number of phases and add new mask Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add mapping function to pmbus_read_block_data() Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 18:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-07-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: Document MAX20826 and similar devices Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] hwmon: (pmbus) add support for " Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-28 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728162749.A42051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox