From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3151D353A60; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785402207; cv=none; b=KBX47qDSFqiyH7NZGgUItRIDJpQJ3hoykYUrFx6AIf1GJT/3kGeYaHcoPxjipfxZruo4/OD2V9uAmaYRiPeBsGOu+Ezk36JlwGDTCXGnrm0O5G89349fDMufrAjMxYH3rzd9MaO/QuFnDZwkAM9h9gxt8Fp75+z8JRM5gRGoo7E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785402207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Yi9rHiqXfSpsfsjAF1ysvNfameWpc5agZJadGPKN/IM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Xcrp0wITNlMRSIgQTYydiyYWF6849FJYx4DTe/yCZD8ovekhHJ1/QKQCKEK6fbb99m6L2Ld6zvtL0LJRlUXmAu4+qA9nG3dSGmfOkR0rlsQi/Oa+SXfG95XJiZMbaaDgAwaFsWpla92+j01x39AjNkxAVr90C633HyAFwiua6ZA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=af0uzbJz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="af0uzbJz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB9E01F000E9; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:03:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785402206; bh=Yi9rHiqXfSpsfsjAF1ysvNfameWpc5agZJadGPKN/IM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=af0uzbJzYKPKjbuXxyWbneK9wzLW4A7w+T+evMdPT9Iod52eZY314U34p1sGYxeK9 rr24mlLe/wmD8WoVvMIfbkKP8mSvjSSJMRXeOZmkp9geoCb+EJz++OjLRepN2fybio WRBMe9s45ZfrO+5ZLiyy91hkl6rpCVESF/ISe5n4cjqxBU3DLZoZmktZkHGtTs9GXD uVQzLhtiifxmmehW3oQ8OYRhlOxPwWpGNktDZqZUl8In8osq4CFu30DDRYCGWks6QP lo7hEz4sAedVl5rqX1h4hYCY7h4FsCLj2Mm2ZpTIoo++6b+JdAexOLxzppbKPdZk5o lR9gWGxdrFDBA== Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:03:22 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Esteban Urrutia Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475 Message-ID: <20260730-resourceful-scrupulous-goshawk-c9ea53@quoll> References: <20260729-sm8475-pmic-glink-v1-0-c2e1967c04de@proton.me> <20260729-sm8475-pmic-glink-v1-1-c2e1967c04de@proton.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260729-sm8475-pmic-glink-v1-1-c2e1967c04de@proton.me> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:48:24PM -0400, Esteban Urrutia wrote: > Add compatible string for pmic-glink. First, not true. You did not add compatible for pmic-glink. Second, that's redundant. You just repeated subject and the diff (although incorrectly). Explain why this is not compatible with existing variants, writing bindings EXPLICITLY ask for that. Best regards, Krzysztof