From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] block: partitions: of: Attach partition fwnode to the block device
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:01:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731160121.9E4DC1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-block-as-nvmem-v9-5-f72935817dbf@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Fwnode reference leak in partition parsing error and skip paths.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized stack variable `len` validation allows NULL pointer dereference when the 'reg' property is missing.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v9 05/10] block: partitions: of: Attach partition fwnode to the block device ---
commit a6e4cc997f016ffdca55d082b2ff10454aec24f8
Author: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
block: partitions: of: Attach partition fwnode to the block device
The OF partition parser reads offset, size and label from each
"fixed-partitions" child node but does not associate that node with the
resulting partition block device. As a result a partition has no
of_node, unlike the whole-disk device which gets its firmware node via
add_disk_fwnode().
> diff --git a/block/partitions/of.c b/block/partitions/of.c
> index 53664ea06b654..4fc7c80c407de 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/of.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/of.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ static void add_of_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state, int slot,
> partname = of_get_property(np, "name", &len);
> strscpy(info->volname, partname, sizeof(info->volname));
>
> + state->parts[slot].fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(of_fwnode_handle(np));
> +
> seq_buf_printf(&state->pp_buf, "(%s)", info->volname);
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this create a fwnode reference leak if the partitions are never
successfully added?
If blk_add_partitions() aborts early (such as for zoned block devices) or
skips a partition, it jumps to out_free_state and calls free_partitions().
This frees the parsed partitions array without dropping the unconsumed
fwnode references.
Also, if add_partition() fails before calling device_initialize():
block/partitions/core.c:add_partition() {
...
err = -ENOMEM;
bdev = bdev_alloc(disk, partno);
if (!bdev)
goto out_put_disk;
...
}
will it return an error without dropping the fwnode, since part_release()
will never be executed to clean it up?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the uninitialized len variable cause a
NULL pointer dereference when parsing malformed device trees?
Looking at validate_of_partition() in the same file:
block/partitions/of.c:validate_of_partition() {
int len;
const __be32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", &len);
...
}
If the 'reg' property is missing, of_get_property() returns NULL and leaves
the stack variable len uninitialized. If the uninitialized stack garbage in
len happens to satisfy the subsequent length check:
if (len / sizeof(*reg) != a_cells + s_cells)
it will proceed to evaluate:
offset = of_read_number(reg, a_cells);
Since reg is NULL, will this result in a kernel panic?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-block-as-nvmem-v9-0-f72935817dbf@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 16:00 [PATCH v9 00/10] Support for block device NVMEM providers Loic Poulain
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] dt-bindings: mmc: Document fixed-layout NVMEM provider support Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 8:39 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] dt-bindings: net: wireless: qcom,ath10k: Document NVMEM cells Loic Poulain
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qcom: Add NVMEM BD address cell Loic Poulain
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] block: partitions: of: Attach partition fwnode to the block device Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 8:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] block: implement NVMEM provider Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] net: of_net: Add of_get_nvmem_eui48() helper for EUI-48 lookup Loic Poulain
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Add NVMEM-backed BD address retrieval Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] Bluetooth: qca: Set NVMEM BD address quirks when address is invalid Loic Poulain
2026-07-30 16:00 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses Loic Poulain
2026-07-31 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731160121.9E4DC1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).