Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:00:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803100035.139691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803094125.3285895-7-gahing@gahingwoo.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `vdd_npu_s0` regulator is forcibly kept `regulator-always-on`, defeating runtime dynamic power management for the NPU.
- [Medium] The patch only enables the first NPU core (`rknn_core_0`), leaving the second symmetric NPU core (`rknn_core_1`) disabled.
--

--- Patch [6]: [RFC PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU ---
commit 2ef1c8164923c68f245bae8c6ee995f5fd70d4d3
Author: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU

Enable rknn_core_0 and its IOMMU on the Radxa ROCK 4D and supply the
core from vdd_npu_s0.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-rock-4d.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-rock-4d.dts
> index 272af1012ab03..965e0906bd07e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-rock-4d.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-rock-4d.dts

[ ... ]

> @@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ regulator-state-mem {
>  			};
>  
>  			vdd_npu_s0: dcdc-reg2 {
> +				regulator-always-on;

[Severity: Medium]
Does keeping this regulator always-on defeat runtime dynamic power management
for the NPU?

The regulator will remain permanently powered, leading to unnecessary power
drain when the NPU is idle. Could we remove regulator-always-on and instead
assign this as the domain-supply for the NPU power domain so the generic
power domain framework can dynamically toggle the voltage?

>  				regulator-boot-on;
>  				regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <400>;
>  				regulator-min-microvolt = <550000>;

[ ... ]

> @@ -869,3 +870,12 @@ vp0_out_hdmi: endpoint@ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI0 {
>  		remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_in_vp0>;
>  	};
>  };
> +
> +&rknn_core_0 {
> +	npu-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&rknn_mmu_0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};

[Severity: Medium]
Is there a reason to only enable the first NPU core (rknn_core_0) and leave
the second symmetric core (rknn_core_1) disabled?

Since both cores share the same voltage supply and power domains, leaving
rknn_core_1 and rknn_mmu_1 disabled limits the board to half of its
physical AI compute capacity.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803094125.3285895-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com?part=6

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03  9:41 [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] pmdomain/rockchip: cycle optional power-domain resets on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03 10:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03  9:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 15:44   ` Igor Paunovic
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576: add NPU (RKNN) nodes Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03  9:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:05   ` Igor Paunovic
2026-08-03  9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-03 10:00   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803100035.139691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox