Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Binbin Zhou" <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org,
	lee@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] thermal/drivers/loongson2: Correct thermal sensor registration loop
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 13:01:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804130146.548AE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c0f32f83a43a11a35e151fe97e9b5d4b21ea459.1785829933.git.zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver allows registering any sensor ID from 0 to 3 but unconditionally configures hardware registers for sensor 0.
- [High] The device's hardware interrupt is left enabled when probe fails or the driver is unbound.
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference if `device_get_match_data()` returns NULL.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v4 1/5] thermal/drivers/loongson2: Correct thermal sensor registration loop ---
commit 04ee4726d4d6013e77a52a26bf79466c2069029a
Author: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>

thermal/drivers/loongson2: Correct thermal sensor registration loop

This commit fixes the registration loop in loongson2_thermal_probe() by
correctly handling -ENODEV and only aborting on fatal errors. It also
ensures at least one thermal zone is registered before proceeding.

> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c
> index ea4dd2fb1f473..5f47fa51fb907 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c
> @@ -161,16 +161,18 @@ static int loongson2_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if device_get_match_data() returns NULL
(for example, via manual sysfs binding), can this cause a NULL pointer
dereference earlier in this function?

drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c:loongson2_thermal_probe() {
	...
	data->chip_data = device_get_match_data(dev);
	...
	if (data->chip_data->flags & LS2K2000_THSENS_OUT_FLAG) {
	...
}

>  
>  	for (i = 0; i <= LOONGSON2_MAX_SENSOR_SEL_NUM; i++) {
>  		tzd = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(dev, i, data, thermal_ops);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this leave the hardware
interrupt enabled if probe fails later or the driver is unbound?

During devm_thermal_of_zone_register(), the thermal core registers the zone
and invokes tz->ops->set_trips(). This calls
loongson2_thermal_set(..., enable=true), which enables the hardware interrupt.

However, there appears to be no corresponding remove function in
loongson2_thermal_driver, nor a devm_add_action_or_reset() callback to
disable the interrupt if devm_request_threaded_irq() fails or the driver is
unbound.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but if the device tree specifies a thermal
zone for a sensor ID other than 0, will the hardware configuration match the
intended sensor?

The probe loop registers the zone for sensor index i and breaks, but
loongson2_set_ctrl_regs() uses a statically defined thermal_sensor_sel:

drivers/thermal/loongson2_thermal.c:loongson2_set_ctrl_regs() {
	int reg_off = data->chip_data->thermal_sensor_sel * 2;
	...
}

It seems this calculates the register offset ignoring the actually registered
sensor ID, potentially resulting in reading from and writing limits to the
hardware registers of sensor 0 instead.

>  		if (!IS_ERR(tzd))
>  			break;
>  
> -		if (PTR_ERR(tzd) != -ENODEV)
> +		if (PTR_ERR(tzd) == -ENODEV)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(tzd), "failed to register");
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(tzd), "failed to register sensor %d\n", i);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (IS_ERR(tzd))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No thermal sensor registered\n");
> +
>  	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, loongson2_thermal_irq_thread,
>  					IRQF_ONESHOT, "loongson2_thermal", tzd);
>  	if (ret < 0)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1785829933.git.zhoubinbin@loongson.cn?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 12:40 [PATCH v4 0/5] thermal: loongson2: Add support for Loongson-2K0300 SoC Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 12:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] thermal/drivers/loongson2: Correct thermal sensor registration loop Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 13:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] thermal/drivers/loongson2: Move thermal_ops to chip_data for SoC scalability Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 12:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Allow syscon compatible for Loongson-2K0300 chip id Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 12:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05  6:59   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-04 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: thermal: loongson,ls2k-thermal: Add compatible for Loongson-2K0300 Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 12:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] thermal/drivers/loongson2: Add support " Binbin Zhou
2026-08-04 12:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] thermal: loongson2: Add support for Loongson-2K0300 SoC Huacai Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804130146.548AE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhoubinbin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox