From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Janani Sunil" <janani.sunil@analog.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:31:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805073151.6DDEE1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805-ad5529r-driver-v8-3-b41781f5632a@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incorrect endianness configuration for 16-bit regmap value format, causing byte-swapped SPI data transmission.
- [High] The driver attempts an SPI transaction (software reset) immediately after enabling power regulators, failing to account for internal Power-On Reset (POR) delay.
- [Medium] External reference voltage is ignored in IIO scale and offset calculations.
- [Low] The 20 ns delay (`ndelay(20)`) used to hold the hardware reset line active is too short for reliable software-controlled assertion.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v8 3/3] iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support ---
commit 2d3e31b4283b225ad0ff6048ec906544c72c44b0
Author: Janani Sunil <janani.sunil@analog.com>
iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support
Add support for AD5529R 16-channel, 12/16 bit Digital to Analog Converter
from Analog Devices. The device communicates over SPI and supports
per-channel output range configuration. An optional external 4.096V
reference can be used in place of the internal reference.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5529r.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5529r.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..1ea0ddfdda994
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5529r.c
[ ... ]
> +static int ad5529r_reset(struct ad5529r_state *st)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *rst;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&st->spi->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rst))
> + return PTR_ERR(rst);
> +
> + if (rst) {
> + ret = reset_control_assert(rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Minimum reset low width (t_reset) is 20 ns per datasheet. */
> + ndelay(20);
[Severity: Low]
While the datasheet minimum is 20 ns, is this ndelay(20) too short for
reliable software-controlled assertion?
Depending on bus latencies, PCB capacitance, and pull-up resistor values,
driving a physical line via software GPIO for such a short pulse might not
reach the logic threshold to reliably trigger a reset.
> +
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap_8bit, AD5529R_REG_INTERFACE_CONFIG_A,
> + AD5529R_INTERFACE_CONFIG_A_SW_RESET);
[Severity: High]
Will this SPI transaction fail if regulators were just enabled dynamically in
ad5529r_probe()?
The device requires 10 ms for digital initialization after power-up. If we
execute this software reset immediately without a preceding delay, the command
might be ignored or the device may set a NOT_READY_ERR.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
[ ... ]
> +static int ad5529r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct ad5529r_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int reg_addr, reg_val_h;
> + int ret, range_idx, span_mv;
> +
> + switch (mask) {
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
[ ... ]
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> + range_idx = st->output_range_idx[chan->channel];
> +
> + span_mv = ad5529r_output_ranges_mV[range_idx][1] -
> + ad5529r_output_ranges_mV[range_idx][0];
> + *val = span_mv;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this scale calculation report incorrect values if a non-default external
reference voltage is supplied?
This calculation strictly uses the hardcoded millivolt spans from
ad5529r_output_ranges_mV. If a user supplies an external reference of a
different voltage, scaling shouldn't be statically tied to this table (which
likely assumes a 4.096V reference).
> + *val2 = st->model_data->resolution;
> +
> + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
[ ... ]
> +static int ad5529r_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> + struct ad5529r_state *st;
> + struct regmap_config regmap_8bit_cfg;
> + struct regmap_config regmap_16bit_cfg;
[ ... ]
> + regmap_16bit_cfg = (struct regmap_config) {
> + .name = "ad5529r-16bit",
> + .reg_bits = 16,
> + .val_bits = 16,
> + .max_register = AD5529R_MAX_REGISTER,
> + .read_flag_mask = AD5529R_SPI_READ_FLAG,
> + .val_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE,
[Severity: High]
Can this cause hardware malfunction due to byte-swapping SPI data transmission?
This configures the regmap to byteswap the 16-bit values into little-endian
format. Since reg_format_endian isn't explicitly defined, it defaults the
register address to REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG. Mixed endianness across a single SPI
transaction is highly unusual for Analog Devices DACs, which typically expect
MSB-first for the entire frame.
> + .rd_table = &ad5529r_16bit_readable_table,
> + .wr_table = &ad5529r_16bit_writeable_table,
> + .reg_stride = 2,
> + .reg_base = dev_addr << AD5529R_ADDR_SHIFT,
> + };
[ ... ]
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable_optional(dev, "vref");
[Severity: Medium]
Should we query the voltage of the external vref regulator here via
regulator_get_voltage()?
The regulator is retrieved and enabled, but its voltage is never read, which
leads to the hardcoded span issue in ad5529r_read_raw() if the voltage differs
from the default reference.
> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> + external_vref = false;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805-ad5529r-driver-v8-0-b41781f5632a@analog.com?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 7:17 [PATCH v8 0/3] iio: dac: Add support for AD5529R DAC Janani Sunil
2026-08-05 7:17 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property Janani Sunil
2026-08-05 7:17 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add AD5529R Janani Sunil
2026-08-05 7:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:29 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-05 7:17 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support Janani Sunil
2026-08-05 7:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805073151.6DDEE1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=janani.sunil@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox