Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state

[Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:11:12PM +0200, Sasha Finkelstein wrote:
> From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
> 
> Check for data before reading the body of a reply, and check for
> end of data afterwards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
> ---
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
> index 376cf682c43e..4d5356bf9bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
>  #define SPMI_STATUS_REG 0
>  #define SPMI_CMD_REG 0x4
>  #define SPMI_RSP_REG 0x8
> +#define SPMI_ACT_REG 0xa4
>  
> +#define SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH BIT(0)
>  #define SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(24)
>  
>  #define REG_POLL_INTERVAL_US 10000
> @@ -29,6 +31,7 @@
>  
>  struct apple_spmi {
>  	void __iomem *regs;
> +	bool prev_fail;
>  };
>  
>  #define poll_reg(spmi, reg, val, cond) \
> @@ -49,6 +52,7 @@ static int apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
>  
>  	ret = poll_reg(spmi, SPMI_STATUS_REG, status, !(status & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY));
>  	if (ret) {
> +		spmi->prev_fail = true;
>  		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
>  			"failed to wait for RX FIFO not empty\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -67,6 +71,11 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
>  	u8 i;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
> +		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
> +		spmi->prev_fail = false;
> +	}
> +
>  	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
>  
>  	ret = apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(ctrl);
> @@ -78,6 +87,11 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
>  
>  	/* Read SPMI data reply */
>  	while (len_read < len) {
> +		if (readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY) {
> +			dev_err_ratelimited(&ctrl->dev,
> +					    "FIFO lacks reply data, controller stuck?\n");
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
>  		rsp = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
>  		i = 0;
>  		while ((len_read < len) && (i < 4)) {
> @@ -86,6 +100,11 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
> +		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
> +		spmi->prev_fail = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -97,6 +116,11 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
>  	size_t i = 0, j;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
> +		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
> +		spmi->prev_fail = false;
> +	}
> +
>  	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
>  
>  	while (i < len) {
> @@ -115,6 +139,11 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
>  	/* Discard */
>  	readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
>  
> +	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
> +		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
> +		spmi->prev_fail = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>

Janne