From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdurrahman Hussain" <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] of/overlay: don't create "//" paths for fragments targeting the root
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:45:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805204513.806C41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805-nh-of-alias-overlay-v6-7-74f21d440819@nexthop.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Node reference leak for initialized fragments if find_target() fails in init_overlay_changeset().
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v6 07/10] of/overlay: don't create "//" paths for fragments targeting the root ---
commit 160c0459de49f61664940cc0b23bceacbf1b3082
Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
of/overlay: don't create "//" paths for fragments targeting the root
dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop() rewrites a symbol value by replacing its
"/fragment/__overlay__" prefix with the fragment's target path. When
the fragment targets the root node the target path is "/" and the
result starts with "//", which __of_find_node_by_full_path() cannot
resolve.
Drop the target path when it is the root and the tail is non-empty. A
value naming the fragment root itself (empty tail) keeps the "/".
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index 9b9f198a1d70a..89a9fe6d6e786 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ static struct property *dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop(
> if (!target_path)
> return NULL;
> target_path_len = strlen(target_path);
> + /* a root target renders as "/"; drop it to avoid "//" results */
> + if (target_path_len == 1 && target_path[0] == '/' && path_tail_len)
> + target_path_len = 0;
>
> new_prop = kzalloc_obj(*new_prop);
> if (!new_prop)
[ ... ]
> @@ -804,13 +804,13 @@ static int init_overlay_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs,
> cnt = 0;
> for_each_child_of_node(ovcs->overlay_root, node) {
> overlay_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "__overlay__");
> if (!overlay_node)
> continue;
>
> fragment = &fragments[cnt];
> fragment->overlay = overlay_node;
> fragment->target = find_target(node, target_base);
> if (!fragment->target) {
> of_node_put(fragment->overlay);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> of_node_put(node);
> goto err_out;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this jump to err_out leak device
node references if previous fragments were already successfully populated?
If a subsequent fragment's find_target() fails (e.g., due to an invalid target
path in the overlay), the function jumps to err_out without updating
ovcs->count.
Because ovcs->count remains 0, the cleanup function free_overlay_changeset()
will skip its loop and fail to call of_node_put() for the previously
successfully resolved fragment nodes.
Could ovcs->count be updated to cnt before jumping to err_out so that
free_overlay_changeset() can clean up the previously populated elements?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805-nh-of-alias-overlay-v6-0-74f21d440819@nexthop.ai?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 20:30 [PATCH v6 00/10] of: teach overlay code to keep /aliases in sync Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] of: fix out-of-bounds read in of_alias_scan() stem parser Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-06 8:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] of: hold a reference on of_aliases during alias path resolution Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] of/overlay: look up absolute target-paths absolutely Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] of/overlay: put property on deadprops only after changeset add succeeds Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] of/overlay: only treat a positive changeset id as registered Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 7:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] of/overlay: don't create "//" paths for fragments targeting the root Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] of/overlay: return ERR_PTR from dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop() Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] of/overlay: rewrite /aliases path values to live-tree paths Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-08-05 20:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] of: unittest: cover /aliases updates from overlay apply/revert Abdurrahman Hussain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805204513.806C41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=abdurrahman@nexthop.ai \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox