Re: [PATCH v35 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The `kernel-doc` directive references a non-existent file `drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c`, which will cause Sphinx build warnings or errors during documentation generation.
- [Low] Grammatical issues and awkward phrasing in the newly added documentation.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v35 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces ---
commit 5b71a12dcba08cd85c4d04d9b33297065e03bb54
Author: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>

Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces
    
Documents i.MX SoC's Service layer and C_DEV driver for selected SoC(s)
that contains the NXP hardware IP(s) for Secure Enclaves(se).

> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> index 06ac89adaafba..6c6fa9a0ba1df 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
[ ... ]
> +Each of the above features is enabled through dedicated NXP H/W IP on the SoC.
> +On a single SoC, multiple hardware IP (or can say more than one secure enclave)
> +can exist.
> +
> +NXP SoCs enabled with the such secure enclaves(SEs) IPs are:
> +i.MX93, i.MX8ULP

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the phrasing "with the such secure enclaves(SEs) IPs"
reads a bit awkwardly. Should this perhaps be "with such secure enclave (SE)
IPs" instead? 

There are a couple of other similar grammatical structures in this section 
(like "The NXP's i.MX HW IP" and "multiple hardware IP") that might also
benefit from being smoothed out.

[ ... ]
> +When a user sends a command to the firmware, it registers its device_ctx
> +as waiter of a response from firmware.
> +
> +Enclave's Firmware owns the storage management over a Linux filesystem.
> +For this c_dev provisions a dedicated slave device called "receiver".
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> +   :export:

[Severity: Low]
Will this kernel-doc directive trigger Sphinx build warnings during make
htmldocs?

It looks like drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c is not included in this patch.
Does the file exist in the current tree, or should this documentation patch
be combined with the patch that actually introduces se_ctrl.c to prevent
documentation build errors?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806-imx-se-if-v35-0-11b25bb308ef@nxp.com?part=1