From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vikash Garodia" <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Reserve low IOVA range for Iris
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:54:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807085406.6CF101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807-iris_iova_600mb_fix-v1-11-3996f67e33f9@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing error handling for `of_translate_dma_region` leads to uninitialized stack usage and a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] The loop parsing `iommu-addresses` fails to advance the property pointer when skipping entries for other devices, corrupting parsing.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH 11/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Reserve low IOVA range for Iris ---
commit c7d055796e0d5e48c39a3d7938283d3a8d0628e4
Author: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Reserve low IOVA range for Iris
This commit adds a reserved-memory IOVA reservation node for the Iris VPU to
keep IOMMU allocations above 0x25800000, preventing unhandled SMMU faults.
It also references the reservation node from the Iris node.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> index dd738d13df8e0..cf17c76a4a390 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> @@ -562,6 +562,17 @@ adsp_rpc_remote_heap_mem: adsp-rpc-remote-heap {
> size = <0x0 0xc00000>;
> reusable;
> };
> +
> + /*
> + * The Iris VPU reserves IOVA below 0x25800000 (600MB),
> + * primarily for non-pixel buffers using different Stream IDs.
> + * DMA into that range triggers unhandled SMMU faults and
> + * spontaneous reboots, so reserve it to keep IOMMU
> + * allocations above this boundary.
> + */
> + iris_iova: iris-iova {
> + iommu-addresses = <&iris 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x25800000>;
> + };
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but using iommu-addresses here
exposes a NULL pointer dereference risk in drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c if the
device tree is ever misconfigured.
If of_translate_dma_region() fails (e.g., due to invalid dma-ranges), it
returns NULL, which is assigned directly to maps without checking:
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c:of_iommu_get_resv_regions() {
...
maps = of_translate_dma_region(np, maps, &iova, &length);
...
}
On the next loop iteration, maps is compared to end, and then dereferenced
via be32_to_cpup(maps++), causing a kernel oops and failing to boot:
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c:of_iommu_get_resv_regions() {
...
while (maps < end) {
struct device_node *np;
u32 phandle;
phandle = be32_to_cpup(maps++);
...
}
In addition, length and iova remain uninitialized stack variables. Can we
add a check for NULL after of_translate_dma_region() to prevent this crash?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but adding iommu-addresses here is affected by
a parsing bug in drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c for multi-entry properties.
When parsing the array, if the phandle does not match dev->of_node, the code
skips the if block and loops, but fails to advance past the DMA address and
size cells for the skipped entry:
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c:of_iommu_get_resv_regions() {
...
if (np == dev->of_node) {
int err;
maps = of_translate_dma_region(np, maps, &iova, &length);
...
}
The next loop iteration will misinterpret the skipped DMA address as the next
phandle, corrupting the parsing entirely. Does this need to be fixed in
of_iommu_get_resv_regions() to safely support multi-entry iommu-addresses
properties?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807-iris_iova_600mb_fix-v1-0-3996f67e33f9@oss.qualcomm.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5BXSXMNl656WiJPJAMmHvb3I2NzYMshRZuGuub3CxEXvdCUlIDKYbnv5jUq-pa6P1NibBLkO3njnKGxi7Al3jQ==@protonmail.internalid>
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 00/22] media: iris: Restrict lower IOVA range for Venus and Iris VPUs Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: media: qcom,venus-common: Allow IOVA reservation memory-region Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:51 ` Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 02/22] dt-bindings: media: qcom,sm8550-iris: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 9:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 03/22] dt-bindings: media: qcom,sc7180-venus: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Reserve low IOVA range for Iris Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 9:03 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-07 9:26 ` Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 10:00 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-07 10:22 ` Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 13:18 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-08-07 16:24 ` Rob Herring
2026-08-08 4:37 ` Vishnu Reddy
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 05/22] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 06/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 07/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 08/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 09/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 11/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: dts: qcom: agatti: Reserve low IOVA range for Venus Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 13/22] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 14/22] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:24 ` [PATCH 15/22] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 16/22] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 18/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 9:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 19/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 20/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 9:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 8:25 ` [PATCH 22/22] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 9:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 8:51 ` [PATCH 00/22] media: iris: Restrict lower IOVA range for Venus and Iris VPUs Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-08-07 8:59 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-07 9:05 ` Vikash Garodia
2026-08-07 10:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807085406.6CF101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox