Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/10] nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:39:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807143931.ECF591F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806-block-as-nvmem-v10-4-be598b2a5606@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] A device tree updated to explicitly mark a legacy NVMEM provider with `compatible = "fixed-layout"` will cause duplicate cell registration and fail the driver probe.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v10 04/10] nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself ---
commit d0f87955eb48c0cfb8be42e6d6cfadf192c1f792
Author: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>

nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself

The commit modifies of_nvmem_layout_get_container() to fall back to returning
the nvmem device node itself if it's compatible with "fixed-layout". This
allows cell parsing for providers whose DT node is the fixed-layout container
directly.

> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> index b90584e1b99ea..efa631ce7283b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,18 @@ static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>  
>  struct device_node *of_nvmem_layout_get_container(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
>  {
> -	return of_get_child_by_name(nvmem->dev.of_node, "nvmem-layout");
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	/* Search for nvmem-layout child */
> +	np = of_get_child_by_name(nvmem->dev.of_node, "nvmem-layout");
> +	if (np)
> +		return np;
> +
> +	/* The nvmem of_node is itself a fixed-layout node */
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(nvmem->dev.of_node, "fixed-layout"))
> +		return of_node_get(nvmem->dev.of_node);

[Severity: High]
Does this new logic allow a legacy provider's device node to be returned as a
fixed-layout container and parsed a second time?

If a device tree author updates a legacy NVMEM provider node (where the driver
sets config->add_legacy_fixed_of_cells = true) to explicitly include the
"fixed-layout" compatible property, nvmem_register() will parse it twice:

drivers/nvmem/core.c:nvmem_register() {
    ...
	if (config->add_legacy_fixed_of_cells) {
		rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(nvmem);
		if (rval)
			goto err_remove_cells;
	}

	rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(nvmem);
	if (rval)
		goto err_remove_cells;
    ...
}

Because nvmem_add_one_cell() does not check for duplicates, identical cells
will be appended, causing nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() to fail with -EEXIST
and cleanly abort the driver probe.

> +
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_layout_get_container);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806-block-as-nvmem-v10-0-be598b2a5606@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 14:38 [PATCH v10 00/10] Support for block device NVMEM providers Loic Poulain
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 01/10] dt-bindings: mmc: Document fixed-layout NVMEM provider support Loic Poulain
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 02/10] dt-bindings: net: wireless: qcom,ath10k: Document NVMEM cells Loic Poulain
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 03/10] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qcom: Add NVMEM BD address cell Loic Poulain
2026-08-07 14:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 04/10] nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself Loic Poulain
2026-08-07 14:39   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 05/10] block: partitions: of: Attach partition fwnode to the block device Loic Poulain
2026-08-07 14:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 06/10] block: implement NVMEM provider Loic Poulain
2026-08-07 14:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 07/10] net: of_net: Add of_get_nvmem_eui48() helper for EUI-48 lookup Loic Poulain
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 08/10] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Add NVMEM-backed BD address retrieval Loic Poulain
2026-08-07 14:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 09/10] Bluetooth: qca: Set NVMEM BD address quirks when address is invalid Loic Poulain
2026-08-06 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Add NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT Loic Poulain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807143931.ECF591F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox