Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus dt bindings
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:35:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807153541.64CD21F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807-schneider-v7-2-rc1-eip201-upstream-v5-6-8785f9531cf0@bootlin.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing length validation on `*-map-mask` and `*-map-pass-thru` arrays in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()` allows out-of-bounds memory reads.
- [High] Lack of cycle detection in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()` allows a malicious device tree to cause an infinite loop in the kernel.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v5 6/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus dt bindings ---
commit a3b2f5d6812aa21284326e875a1ad049deda57c7
Author: Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

clk: Add support for clock nexus dt bindings

This patch introduces support for nexus nodes in the clock subsystem. It
transitions the parsing logic from of_parse_phandle_with_args() to
of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() to support clock-map properties.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c b/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
> index 303a0bb26e54a..5380d43b56a42 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ static int __set_clk_parents(struct device_node *node, bool clk_supplier)
>  		       node);
>  
>  	for (index = 0; index < num_parents; index++) {
> -		rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "assigned-clock-parents",
> -					"#clock-cells",	index, &clkspec);
> +		rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args_map(node, "assigned-clock-parents",
> +						    "clock", index, &clkspec);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but changing to
of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() exposes the clock subsystem to a
pre-existing issue. Does of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() properly
validate the lengths of the map-mask and map-pass-thru arrays?

Looking at of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() in drivers/of/base.c, it seems
there are loops that unconditionally access mask[i] and pass[i] up to
list_size:

			for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++, map_len--)
				match &= !((match_array[i] ^ *map++) & mask[i]);

and later:

			if (i < list_size) {
				val &= ~pass[i];
				val |= cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]) & pass[i];
			}

If a device tree node provides clock-map-mask or clock-map-pass-thru properties
that are smaller than the expected size dictated by #clock-cells (list_size),
can this cause an out-of-bounds memory read?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()
prevent infinite loops when parsing maliciously or accidentally crafted
device tree overlays?

In drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map(), the main loop replaces
the current node with the new mapped node without tracking visited nodes or
limiting the mapping depth:

	while (cur) {
		/* Get the <list>-map property */

If a cyclic nexus mapping exists (e.g. node A maps to node B, and node B maps
back to node A), could this loop run indefinitely and hang the kernel?

>  		if (rc < 0) {
>  			/* skip empty (null) phandles */
>  			if (rc == -ENOENT)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807-schneider-v7-2-rc1-eip201-upstream-v5-0-8785f9531cf0@bootlin.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 15:24 [PATCH v5 0/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce nexus nodes Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] clk: tests: Add clk_parse_clkspec() Kunit testing Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] clk: tests: Add Kunit testing for of_clk_get_parent_name() Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] clk: Improve a couple of comments Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 16:23   ` Frank Li
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] clk: Use the generic OF phandle parsing in only one place Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 16:26   ` Frank Li
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus dt bindings Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:35   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] clk: tests: Add Kunit testing for nexus nodes Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-07 15:33   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807153541.64CD21F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox