From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:17:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260809201717.BDDF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809200107.842945-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incorrect use of `additionalProperties: false` when inheriting from a common schema via `allOf`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 ---
commit 24ac9b0c966cb6294b25fc745f5c098627bda264
Author: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Date: Sun Aug 9 19:58:50 2026 +0000
dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2
This commit documents the 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 MIPI-DSI TFT LCD
panel based on the Ilitek ILI79600A controller.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml
[ ... ]
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
[ ... ]
> + backlight: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Medium]
Should this use unevaluatedProperties: false instead?
Because this binding inherits from panel-common.yaml# in the allOf block,
using additionalProperties: false will cause the schema to reject any valid
inherited properties (such as rotation or port) when evaluating a device tree.
Using unevaluatedProperties: false would correctly evaluate the properties
provided by the $ref, which would also allow the redundant local declaration
of backlight: true to be removed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260809200107.842945-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-09 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 19:58 [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Make enable GPIO optional Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Set prepare_prev_first Marek Vasut
2026-08-10 9:45 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Add support for Ilitek ILI79600A-based panels Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 20:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260809201717.BDDF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox