From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Robin Snyders" <robin@snyders.xyz>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: qcom_smbx: program AICL rerun time
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:46:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811204650.868241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811-submit-qcom-smbx-send-v1-v1-3-feec6cfa123a@snyders.xyz>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The watchdog interrupt handler writes to a register without adding the peripheral base address.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: qcom_smbx: program AICL rerun time ---
commit 7ed13fc0edf8d350c9eda801c5d3ae1f45ee12b6
Author: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@linaro.org>
power: supply: qcom_smbx: program AICL rerun time
The bootloader-provided automatic input current limit rerun interval is
not a stable software interface. Program a consistent three-second
interval during probe. This is required at least on SMB5 hardware.
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbx.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbx.c
> index 09d9e0f95cb56..9e3e240b68130 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbx.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbx.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1384,6 +1385,14 @@ static int smb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>
> + rc = regmap_write_bits(chip->regmap,
> + chip->base + AICL_RERUN_TIME_CFG,
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but seeing the correct usage of chip->base
here, is the regmap write in smb_handle_wdog_bark() writing to an arbitrary
PMIC peripheral?
drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbx.c:smb_handle_wdog_bark() {
...
rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap, BARK_BITE_WDOG_PET,
BARK_BITE_WDOG_PET_BIT);
...
}
It appears to be missing chip->base, which could fail to pet the charger
watchdog and corrupt the state of another peripheral when the watchdog bark
interrupt fires.
> + AICL_RERUN_TIME_MASK,
> + AICL_RERUN_TIME_3_SECS);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(chip->dev, rc,
> + "could not set AICL rerun time\n");
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260811-submit-qcom-smbx-send-v1-v1-0-feec6cfa123a@snyders.xyz?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 20:35 [PATCH 0/3] power: supply: qcom_smbx: add SMB5 support Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: supply: qcom,pmi8998-charger: add SMB5 PMICs Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] power: supply: qcom_smbx: add SMB5 support Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 20:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 20:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: qcom_smbx: program AICL rerun time Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 20:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-11 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] power: supply: qcom_smbx: add SMB5 support Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: power: supply: qcom,pmi8998-charger: add SMB5 PMICs Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 23:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] power: supply: qcom_smbx: add SMB5 support Robin Snyders via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260811204650.868241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin@snyders.xyz \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox