From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Ng Ho Yin" <adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: add USB3.1 controller node
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 07:53:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812075345.41CD01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <628275930f99fb6cdc3edb7269ac75cd04f870dd.1786518803.git.adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Devicetree structurally contradicts itself regarding 40-bit DMA support for the USB3.1 controller.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: add USB3.1 controller node ---
commit 2f2039b2059cdc372b94f8f6d45151844510ff80
Author: Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com>
arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: add USB3.1 controller node
This patch adds a DTS node for the Synopsys DWC3 USB3.1 controller on the
Agilex5 SoC. It places the device under a simple-bus configured with a 40-bit
DMA window and enables it in host mode on the SoCDK board.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
> index b06c6d5d60eed..043b980832c23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
> @@ -494,6 +494,33 @@ usb0: usb@10b00000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + usb31_bus: usb-bus@11000000 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges = <0x00 0x11000000 0x00 0x100000>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x00 0x00 0x100 0x00>;
[Severity: High]
Does this dma-ranges property structurally contradict the #address-cells
configuration for a 40-bit DMA window?
The usb31_bus node and its parent soc@0 both use #address-cells = <1>.
With a 32-bit (4 GB) child address space, is it mathematically possible to
accommodate the 1 TB (<0x100 0x00>) window length specified in dma-ranges?
When the Linux OF core parses this, won't it truncate the window against the
parent's 32-bit boundaries and silently limit the device to 32-bit DMA?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1786518803.git.adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 7:32 [PATCH v3 0/6] Add USB3.1 support for Agilex5 Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: agilex5: Add USB3.1 reference clock ID Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] clk: socfpga: agilex5: add usb3.1 reference clock Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: usb: add Altera Agilex5 DWC3 controller Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: add USB3.1 controller node Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: intel: agilex5: remove usb0 in Agilex5 SoCDK Adrian Ng Ho Yin
2026-08-12 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] usb: dwc3: add Altera Agilex5 support to generic platform driver Adrian Ng Ho Yin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812075345.41CD01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox