Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Biju <biju.das.au@gmail.com>
Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:56:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812155631.499EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812141940.246223-8-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unprobeable Hardware Dependency causing USB controllers to fail
- [Low] Missing Device Tree Binding Documentation for new compatible string
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes ---
commit 300a9b2b9e754dfa39a649f78e39731613f70c2b
Author: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes

Add USB2.0 function device nodes to the RZ/G3L (r9a08g046) SoC DTSI.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707145135.247565-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> index 2d8c8fd8a01cd..7cf29aed52110 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> @@ -1105,6 +1105,44 @@ usb2_phy1: usb-phy@11e90200 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> +		hsusb0: usb@11e30000 {
> +			compatible = "renesas,usbhs-r9a08g046",
> +				     "renesas,rzg2l-usbhs";

[Severity: Low]
Is the renesas,usbhs-r9a08g046 compatible string documented in the device
tree bindings?

It appears this might cause dtbs_check to fail with a warning since it
is not defined in the valid enumerations within
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/renesas,usbhs.yaml.

> +			reg = <0 0x11e30000 0 0x10000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 124 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 125 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 122 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A08G046_USB_PCLK>,
> +				 <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A08G046_USB_U2P0_EXR_CPUCLK>;
> +			resets = <&phyrst 0>,
> +				 <&cpg R9A08G046_USB_U2P0_EXL_SYSRST>;
> +			renesas,buswait = <7>;
> +			phys = <&usb2_phy0 3>;

[Severity: High]
Will this create an unresolvable probe deferral?

The renesas_usbhs driver calls phy_get() during probe, depending on
usb2_phy0 here. However, the usb2_phy0 node only specifies
compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r9a08g046" without a generic fallback like
"renesas,rzg2l-usb2-phy".

Since the phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c PHY driver does not match
"renesas,usb2-phy-r9a08g046", the PHY device might not probe, causing
phy_get() to continually return -EPROBE_DEFER.

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812141940.246223-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 14:19 [PATCH v7 0/9] Add RZ/G3L USB2.0 host support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dt-bindings: reset: renesas,rzg2l-usbphy-ctrl: Document RZ/G3L support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 host/phy device nodes Biju
2026-08-12 15:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function " Biju
2026-08-12 15:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046l48-smarc: Add USB2.0 Host support Biju
2026-08-12 16:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046l48-smarc: Enable USB2.0 function support Biju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812155631.499EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox