From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FB5480942; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786555693; cv=none; b=cjzzVgYhHtHcCnB4roEPNeXr9R8rekVngi6XWefbw/gOsZXWqNZA3N9fu2bzWoBO19ChYqsVf8v1EwnpMRmnN4+9XxOQTgRDwnl8LI3p89Nx+WvNrx9Maz8QG89cLfLjWf6/qsz2cDQzsHEbGNHP02OkuNFEw4zoC+hRC7FmjQw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786555693; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TqrWsNn1+9iDVwIvcbXJ4HHE2kBtuJoamk/kteBuO0c=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=EwRHJog4oYoxgtvvB9sZye+POJRCkX7HFgL3el8pI6iDc3DtL0TKAtNZhVBmB5NpklXNrs663Bi1dq6w4FqxlYlUjnfMAx8JvkYQ03Gv5RdOwnrCV8qMP7PH7vGAiRxt8ct6gDevNpPDJhVI9Tdu7jowbBv3KUv9M03dhXt9SRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lRi9Bk05; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lRi9Bk05" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59E921F000E9; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786555691; bh=GgxkyQ/W1H2f7/LkcJkSDmIji8DnE8AvhmpXXiTk/vk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lRi9Bk05e7dadB2O2uNW/gj5nW3XYwad8jc0ezU3tjjytO1nTmAaxJGSiGZv5O82f 2PAq+iF6APGRa3xlpEROzztf9SoXRhRWar7X1GK6w/X0TIoEs8DoLl0i61NjiFUsor fm8Odku4D39rXxOLvcDtHxEFXheCzpLRafvXlW+VVfmDx7rqwW/e8NS5uNHf666Q2i y3msNfwcPQbid03w37ns+tD4jzeDN4M9ewGhAj0+DVZ5W3k+aBdY5LyuPflk689cJE vM8ZniGrPx1EWPqVZ9N5JEgxhsTdvlBDH/yEpRC0WqMxC4AGsB+yXF6k5DLCumSOmf djPXtwo7+3zzQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: of: introduce of_pci_verify_node() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Alex Elder" Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260812172247.276554-5-elder@riscstar.com> References: <20260812172247.276554-1-elder@riscstar.com> <20260812172247.276554-5-elder@riscstar.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:28:10 +0000 Message-Id: <20260812172811.59E921F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Commit 407d1a51921e9 ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge") linked > the PCI enumeration process together with devicetree, creating a devicetr= ee > node for discovered PCI bridges. Its successor commit ae9813db1dc5a ("PC= I: > Add quirks to generate device tree node for Xilinx Alveo U50") shows how > to use a PCI final fixup quirk to also create a devicetree node for a > non-bridge PCI device. These changes allowed devicetree overlays to > describe components downstream of a PCI device, by providing a place to > attach the overlay. >=20 > Note that the dynamic devicetree node is only created if the device didn't > already have an assigned node. >=20 > Later, commit aa7b4bbcb3a1d ("arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: Add > TC9563 PCIe switch node") *pre-defined* devicetree nodes to represent the > PCI device nodes that would (also) be discovered via the PCI enumeration > [ ... ] >=20 > (There are many things that could be verified for statically-defined > devicetree nodes, but this is all we'll do for now.) >=20 > Signed-off-by: Alex Elder Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812172247.2765= 54-1-elder@riscstar.com?part=3D4