From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: fsl_easrc: expose individual DAIs per conversion path
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:10:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813071005.700121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813070020.719810-6-shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Read-Modify-Write (RMW) on a Write-1-to-Clear (W1C) interrupt status register causes unintentional clearing of concurrent interrupt flags.
- [High] Calling hw_params multiple times for the same stream leaks EASRC hardware contexts and available channels, leading to Use-After-Free (UAF).
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: fsl_easrc: expose individual DAIs per conversion path ---
commit 6668df3f25b7ce9103114dd835e72d2e72b096cc
Author: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
ASoC: fsl_easrc: expose individual DAIs per conversion path
The i.MX EASRC hardware supports four independent conversion contexts.
This commit replaces the single fsl_easrc_dai instance with an array of
four DAI drivers to allow up to four independent conversion paths to be
active at the same time.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c
> index 2b8319b8a609a..c2f0524e949e9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c
> @@ -1589,27 +1589,99 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops fsl_easrc_dai_ops = {
> .hw_free = fsl_easrc_hw_free,
> };
>
> -static struct snd_soc_dai_driver fsl_easrc_dai = {
[ ... ]
> +static struct snd_soc_dai_driver fsl_easrc_dai[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "easrc-0",
[ ... ]
> + {
> + .name = "easrc-3",
> + .playback = {
> + .stream_name = "ASRC3-Playback",
> + .channels_min = 1,
> + .channels_max = 32,
> + .rate_min = 8000,
> + .rate_max = 768000,
> + .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
> + .formats = FSL_EASRC_FORMATS,
> + },
> + .capture = {
> + .stream_name = "ASRC3-Capture",
> + .channels_min = 1,
> + .channels_max = 32,
> + .rate_min = 8000,
> + .rate_max = 768000,
> + .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
> + .formats = FSL_EASRC_FORMATS |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_IEC958_SUBFRAME_LE,
> + },
> + .ops = &fsl_easrc_dai_ops,
> },
> - .ops = &fsl_easrc_dai_ops,
> };
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since multiple DAIs now
allow concurrent streams, could this read-modify-write operation in
fsl_easrc_stop_context() cause issues with interrupt handling?
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c:fsl_easrc_stop_context() {
...
regmap_write_bits(easrc->regmap,
REG_EASRC_IRQF,
EASRC_IRQF_RSD(1 << ctx->index),
EASRC_IRQF_RSD(1 << ctx->index));
...
}
Because REG_EASRC_IRQF is a write-1-to-clear register, will this write
1s back to all currently pending interrupt flags?
If two streams stop simultaneously, could one CPU unintentionally clear
the run-stop-done bit of the other context, causing the other CPU's
polling loop to time out?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but with up to four independent conversion
paths active, is it possible to leak hardware contexts if the ALSA core
calls hw_params multiple times for the same stream?
In sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c:fsl_easrc_hw_params():
ret = fsl_easrc_request_context(channels, ctx);
This unconditionally assigns a new context. Then in
fsl_easrc_request_context():
ctx->index = index;
ctx->channels = channels;
easrc->pair[index] = ctx;
easrc->channel_avail -= channels;
If hw_params is called multiple times without an intermediate hw_free,
won't this leak channels and leave a dangling pointer in the old slot
when ctx is eventually freed?
>
> static const struct snd_soc_component_driver fsl_easrc_component = {
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813070020.719810-1-shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 7:00 [PATCH v4 0/5] ASoC: fsl_asrc/fsl_easrc: expose per-pair/context DAIs and fix DMA race shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update port binding to support multiple paths shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,easrc: add ports binding for multiple conversion paths shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ASoC: fsl_asrc/fsl_easrc: move DMA params into pair/context struct shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 16:54 ` Frank Li
2026-08-13 16:52 ` Frank Li
2026-08-13 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: fsl_asrc: expose individual DAIs per conversion path shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: fsl_easrc: " shengjiu.wang
2026-08-13 7:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813071005.700121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox