From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kanak Shilledar" <kanak.shilledar@axis.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Add InvenSense ICM-42370-p accelerometer
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:34:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813123421.3AC681F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813-b4-inv_icm42370p-v2-1-11aedfdf76d3@axis.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incomplete device tree binding schema rejects valid hardware configurations for SPI, I3C, and reset lines.
- [Low] Missing IIO subsystem mailing list in MAINTAINERS entry.
- [Low] Contradictory schema constraints for the `interrupts` property.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Add InvenSense ICM-42370-p accelerometer ---
commit 580d5dd4de723a5224325d048b11cddaf0d9a2b1
Author: Kanak Shilledar <kanak.shilledar@axis.com>
dt-bindings: Add InvenSense ICM-42370-p accelerometer
This commit adds device tree binding documentation for the InvenSense
ICM-42370-P 3-axis accelerometer. The device supports I2C, SPI, and I3C,
but this initial binding is geared towards I2C. The commit updates the
MAINTAINERS file with the new binding.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/invensense,icm42370p.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/invensense,icm42370p.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..df23406921a51
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/invensense,icm42370p.yaml
[ ... ]
> +dependencies:
> + interrupt-names: [ interrupts ]
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
[Severity: Low]
Does this schema unnecessarily enforce interrupts as a strict requirement?
Since interrupts is listed in the required array, the dependency check
for interrupt-names: [ interrupts ] above is dead logic. Also, since IIO
sensors typically support polling, making interrupts strictly mandatory
might prevent valid polling-based hardware designs from passing validation.
> + - vdd-supply
> + - vddio-supply
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
[Severity: Medium]
Will this strict constraint actively reject valid hardware descriptions for
SPI, I3C, or reset lines?
The commit message mentions support for SPI, I3C, and resets, but since
standard SPI/I3C peripheral property $ref inclusions and the resets property
are missing, unevaluatedProperties: false will cause validation to fail when
standard properties like spi-max-frequency or resets are provided in the
device tree.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 04fa5322d9f74..e4764489ea971 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
[ ... ]
> +INVENSENSE ICM-42370-P ACCELEROMETER
> +M: Kanak Shilledar <kanak.shilledar@axis.com>
> +M: Henrik Grimler <henrik.grimler@axis.com>
> +L: kernel@axis.com
[Severity: Low]
Should this MAINTAINERS entry include the standard IIO subsystem mailing list?
Currently, it only lists a corporate mailing list, omitting
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org which is typically mandatory for IIO entries. This
means patches modifying this binding will not be automatically CC'd to the
subsystem list by get_maintainer.pl.
> +S: Maintained
> +W: https://invensense.tdk.com/
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/invensense,icm42370p.yaml
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813-b4-inv_icm42370p-v2-0-11aedfdf76d3@axis.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 12:26 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add driver for Invensense ICM42370P accelerometer Kanak Shilledar
2026-08-13 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Add InvenSense ICM-42370-p accelerometer Kanak Shilledar
2026-08-13 12:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: accel: Add support for ICM42370P Kanak Shilledar
2026-08-13 12:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: accel: icm42370: Add FIFO buffer functionality Kanak Shilledar
2026-08-13 12:40 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813123421.3AC681F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kanak.shilledar@axis.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox