Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Antoni Pokusinski" <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:20:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814012024.6678E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810193826.210683-4-apokusinski01@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete locking leaves configuration key sequences vulnerable to disruption by concurrent read operations.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes ---
commit 45525a43d1a439e6b8a50fcba7c541c85b598f5c
Author: Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com>

rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes

The ABX80X RTC driver performs multi-step register operations such as
NVMEM transfers or register writes preceded by a configuration key write.
This patch adds a mutex to serialize register writes and protect these
sequences against race conditions.

> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> index fdf9664ebb6f0..0c8d3416fd5a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -234,6 +237,8 @@ static int abx80x_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
>  	buf[ABX8XX_REG_YR] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_year - 100);
>  	buf[ABX8XX_REG_WD] = tm->tm_wday;
>  
> +	guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> +

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch introduces the mutex to
protect multi-step sequences, should the read paths also acquire the lock?

According to the ABX80X hardware specification, the configuration key is
automatically cleared by any subsequent register read or write.

If a sysfs attribute write like oscillator_store() acquires the lock and
writes the configuration key, but another process concurrently calls an
unprotected read path like abx80x_rtc_read_time() or abx80x_read_alarm():

abx80x_rtc_read_time()
    err = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, ABX8XX_REG_HTH, ...);

Could this interleaved I2C read silently clear the configuration key before
the protected write completes, causing the hardware configuration update to
fail?

>  	err = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client, ABX8XX_REG_HTH,
>  					     sizeof(buf), buf);
>  	if (err < 0) {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810193826.210683-1-apokusinski01@gmail.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 19:38 [PATCH v4 0/9] rtc: abx80x: add support for abx81x Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: document ABX81X RTCs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  0:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] rtc: abx80x: fix error check after i2c_smbus_read in read_alarm() Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  1:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  1:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] rtc: abx80x: properly handle shared IRQs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  1:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] rtc: abx80x: add irq to struct abx80x_priv Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  1:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] rtc: abx80x: use regmap instead of I2C specific API Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  1:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  2:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] rtc: abx80x: create abx80x_i2c_probe() Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14  2:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] rtc: abx80x: add support for ABX81X Antoni Pokusinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814012024.6678E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=apokusinski01@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox