From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ricardo Rivera-Matos" <rriveram@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: cs35l45: Adds SYNC properties
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:40:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814224055.3A6C31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814223456.611160-1-rriveram@opensource.cirrus.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Unnecessary use of a child node (`sync`) merely to group configuration properties.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: cs35l45: Adds SYNC properties ---
commit d073a7883f1698278c7c1d6cde1ee5dc878931ca
Author: Ricardo Rivera-Matos <rriveram@opensource.cirrus.com>
ASoC: dt-bindings: cs35l45: Adds SYNC properties
This commit introduces support for the multidevice synchronization (SYNC)
bus by adding properties that allow for the configuration of the device's
transmitter IDs.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/cirrus,cs35l45.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/cirrus,cs35l45.yaml
> index 70f6c62aedca8..f64ba8c872b95 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/cirrus,cs35l45.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/cirrus,cs35l45.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -53,6 +53,29 @@ properties:
> maximum: 3
> default: 2
>
> + sync:
> + description:
> + Multidevice synchronization (SYNC) bus configuration
> + type: object
> + additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Low]
Is it necessary to use a child node here just to group configuration
properties? In Device Tree design, child nodes usually represent distinct
hardware components, sub-devices, buses, or standardized structural elements
rather than serving as logical folders to group related configuration
properties.
Could the cirrus,sync-lsw-txid and cirrus,sync-sw-txid properties be placed
directly in the main device node instead?
[ ... ]
> @@ -155,5 +178,9 @@ examples:
> gpio-ctrl = <0x1>;
> gpio-dir = <0x1>;
> };
> + sync {
> + cirrus,sync-lsw-txid = <0x1>;
> + cirrus,sync-sw-txid = <0x1>;
> + };
[Severity: Low]
Similarly, does the example need to encapsulate these properties in a sync
node? If the node is flattened in the schema, this example would need to be
updated to match.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814223456.611160-1-rriveram@opensource.cirrus.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 22:34 [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: cs35l45: Adds SYNC properties Ricardo Rivera-Matos
2026-08-14 22:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: cs35l45: Adds support for SYNC bus Ricardo Rivera-Matos
2026-08-14 22:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 22:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduces MDSYNC support for CS35L45 Ricardo Rivera-Matos
2026-08-14 22:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814224055.3A6C31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rriveram@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox