From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: spacemit: k3: fix IMSIC guest parameters
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:51:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260816075116.712D31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816074125.2105828-1-guoren@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Reducing `riscv,guest-index-bits` to `<3>` incorrectly caps guest interrupt files and catastrophically breaks the physical MMIO layout for secondary CPUs.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] riscv: dts: spacemit: k3: fix IMSIC guest parameters ---
commit bd339af20fe829df6f685236a32dbabad41e337c
Author: GUO Ren (XuanTie) <guoren@kernel.org>
riscv: dts: spacemit: k3: fix IMSIC guest parameters
This commit updates the K3 device tree IMSIC guest configurations based on
the SpacemiT K3 User Manual. It lowers guest-index-bits and num-guest-ids
for simsic, and removes them entirely for mimsic.
Fixes: 56f37e391a62 ("riscv: dts: spacemit: add initial support for K3 SoC")
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k3.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k3.dtsi
> index c3f2dce0969c0..6dce1e3aa2c91 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k3.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k3.dtsi
[ ... ]
> @@ -1246,9 +1246,9 @@ simsic: interrupt-controller@e0400000 {
> <&cpu4_intc 9>, <&cpu5_intc 9>,
> <&cpu6_intc 9>, <&cpu7_intc 9>;
> msi-controller;
> - riscv,guest-index-bits = <6>;
> + riscv,guest-index-bits = <3>;
[Severity: High]
Will reducing riscv,guest-index-bits to 3 break the physical MMIO layout
for secondary CPUs and incorrectly cap the guest interrupt files?
The IMSIC irqchip driver uses riscv,guest-index-bits to determine the
physical MMIO stride between HARTs (stride = BIT(guest-index-bits) * 4096).
By reducing this from 6 to 3, the calculated stride drops from 256 KB to
32 KB.
With a 32 KB stride, CPU 1's supervisor IMSIC file is incorrectly calculated
to be at base + 32 KB. This offset actually hits CPU 0's 8th guest interrupt
file instead of CPU 1's true supervisor file (at 256 KB).
Additionally, the AIA spec states guest files are indexed 1 to GEILEN. With
GEILEN=8, representing index 8 requires at least 4 bits. Setting
guest-index-bits = 3 mathematically limits the maximum addressable index to
7 (BIT(3) - 1), truncating the 8th guest file.
The commit message mentions that KVM will dynamically correct this via
hgeie, but KVM reads nr_guest_files directly from the irqchip driver, which
enforces the BIT(guest-index-bits) - 1 limit. Is it possible this change
will cause MSIs and IPIs for secondary CPUs to fail?
> riscv,hart-index-bits = <4>;
> - riscv,num-guest-ids = <511>;
> + riscv,num-guest-ids = <63>;
> riscv,num-ids = <511>;
> };
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260816074125.2105828-1-guoren@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 7:41 [PATCH] riscv: dts: spacemit: k3: fix IMSIC guest parameters Guo Ren
2026-08-16 7:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-16 8:40 ` Yixun Lan
2026-08-16 9:01 ` Junhui Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260816075116.712D31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox