From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aiden Isik" <aidenisik@member.fsf.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:33:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817103354.BB64F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817-for-next-lucky7-watchdog-v1-2-a14370e20b92@member.fsf.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `drv_data_exynos5515` variant declares `QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE` but fails to initialize `.disable_reg`, causing unintentional writes to PMU offset 0x0000.
- [High] The `drv_data_exynos5515` variant uses an 'INT_EN' register for masking watchdog reset, but omits the `.mask_reset_inv = true` flag, inverting the WDT reset mask logic.
- [Medium] Incorrect use of an Exynos Auto v920 register macro (`EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_NONCPU_INT_EN`) in an Exynos 5515 variant.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data ---
commit dcaab4881777bc5f5ce1a532adad7c17046164a8
Author: Aiden Isik <aidenisik@member.fsf.org>
watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data
This commit adds driver data and a compatible string for the Exynos5515
SoC's watchdog timer.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> index e31f93db05096..7299dfdb0c099 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -232,6 +232,16 @@ static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5420 = {
> QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE,
> };
>
> +static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5515 = {
> + .mask_reset_reg = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_NONCPU_INT_EN,
[Severity: Medium]
Is this intentionally using an Exynos Auto v920 register macro for an
Exynos 5515 variant, or could this be a copy-paste error?
[Severity: High]
Since this variant uses an INT_EN register for masking the reset, should
the .mask_reset_inv = true flag be set here?
Without the inversion flag, the bitwise masking logic in
s3c2410wdt_mask_wdt_reset() evaluates to (mask ^ false). For INT_EN
registers, this typically writes 1 when intending to mask the reset, and 0
when intending to unmask it, effectively inverting the logic.
> + .mask_bit = 2,
> + .rst_stat_reg = EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET,
> + .rst_stat_bit = 24,
> + .quirks = QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_MASK_RESET | \
> + QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE | \
> + QUIRK_HAS_DBGACK_BIT,
> +};
[Severity: High]
Will this cause unintentional writes to offset 0x0000 of the PMU regmap?
This variant declares QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE but omits .disable_reg.
Since struct fields default to zero, when s3c2410wdt_enable() checks for
this quirk and calls s3c2410wdt_disable_wdt_reset() during driver probe:
s3c2410wdt_disable_wdt_reset()
regmap_update_bits(wdt->pmureg, wdt->drv_data->disable_reg, mask_val, val);
regmap_update_bits() will blindly write to offset 0x0000.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817-for-next-lucky7-watchdog-v1-0-a14370e20b92@member.fsf.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 10:22 [PATCH 0/2] watchdog: Add Exynos5515 watchdog timer support Aiden Isik via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: samsung-wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible Aiden Isik via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 10:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 11:06 ` Aiden Isik
2026-08-17 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data Aiden Isik via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 10:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 11:08 ` Aiden Isik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817103354.BB64F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=aidenisik@member.fsf.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox