From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:53:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819125300.6B9211F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819-mcp47feb02_refactor-v4-9-beb2aa3bfd09@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The EEPROM write cycle polling timeout is too short, leading to sporadic -ETIMEDOUT errors and partial EEPROM updates.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v4 9/9] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 ---
commit f9a8ca3d3f3e9e1b7296c59e5fdc69c68349d1ae
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02
This patch adds SPI support for the Microchip MCP48FxBy1/2/4/8 series of DACs.
It introduces a new SPI driver module that registers devices using the common
core probe function.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02-spi.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02-spi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..0c68d7c318cb2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02-spi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
[ ... ]
> +static int mcp47feb02_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + const struct mcp47feb02_features *chip_features;
> + struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> +
> + chip_features = spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
> + if (!chip_features)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No SPI device found\n");
> +
> + if (chip_features->have_eeprom)
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &mcp47feb02_regmap_config);
> + else
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &mcp47fvb02_regmap_config);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap), "Error initializing SPI regmap\n");
> +
> + return mcp47feb02_common_probe(chip_features, regmap);
> +}
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential timeout
problem in the core driver that might affect these newly supported SPI devices.
In drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02-core.c:mcp47feb02_write_to_eeprom(), the EEPROM
write cycle polling timeout is set to 5 ms:
ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_GAIN_CTRL_STATUS_REG_ADDR,
eewa_val,
!(eewa_val & MCP47FEB02_GAIN_BIT_STATUS_EEWA_MASK),
USEC_PER_MSEC, USEC_PER_MSEC * 5);
Could this short timeout cause sporadic -ETIMEDOUT errors during EEPROM writes?
The EEPROM write cycle (t_WC) for the MCP47/48FEBxx series can take up to 10 ms.
When a user writes to the store_eeprom sysfs attribute, this function is called
in a loop. Could a timeout here cause the sequence to abort midway, leaving
the EEPROM in an inconsistent, partially updated state?
The same 5 ms timeout appears again in store_eeprom_store():
ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_GAIN_CTRL_STATUS_REG_ADDR, eewa_val,
!(eewa_val & MCP47FEB02_GAIN_BIT_STATUS_EEWA_MASK),
USEC_PER_MSEC, USEC_PER_MSEC * 5);
Would it be better to increase the timeout to at least 10 ms to match the
hardware maximum?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819-mcp47feb02_refactor-v4-0-beb2aa3bfd09@microchip.com?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 12:41 [PATCH v4 0/9] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct gain bitshift " Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct false state case in store_eeprom_store Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use dev_dbg for invalid label Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: rename command mask define Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-08-19 12:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819125300.6B9211F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox