Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kendall Willis" <k-willis@ti.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:16:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820221647.2A5861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-smth-v1-4-e1738a38d58e@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `out-band-wakeup` device tree property is added to `m_can` devices, but no C code in the kernel parses this property, making it completely inert. The commit message states this property is intended to allow the `out_band_wakeup` flag to be enabled during suspend. However, an exhaustive search of the kernel source confirms the string `"out-band-wakeup"` is not present in any C code, nor is it documented in the DT bindings. Neither the generic driver core nor the `m_can` driver reads this property or calls `device_set_out_band_wakeup()`. As a result, `dev->power.out_band_wakeup` will remain false, and the intended out-of-band wakeup functionality will not operate.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices ---
commit 7f02e9c8c4b2476d4793985a8f2b56891c451cf2
Author: Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com>

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices

This commit adds the out-band-wakeup property to the mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1
nodes in the k3-am62d2-evm device tree. It intends to enable the
out_band_wakeup flag during suspend for these devices.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> index f5ceb6a1b5deb..7f3c50a56ea87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> @@ -789,6 +789,7 @@ &c7x_0 {
>  };
>  
>  &mcu_mcan0 {
> +	out-band-wakeup;

[Severity: Medium]
Is the "out-band-wakeup" property actually parsed by the kernel?

Looking through the kernel source, there doesn't appear to be any C code
that parses the "out-band-wakeup" string, nor does it seem to be documented
in the DT bindings.

Neither the generic driver core nor the m_can driver appears to read this
property or call device_set_out_band_wakeup(), which would leave
dev->power.out_band_wakeup as false and prevent the intended out-of-band
wakeup functionality from operating.

Does this patch rely on another driver change that hasn't been merged yet?

>  	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default>;
>  	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup>;

[ ... ]

> @@ -800,6 +801,7 @@ &mcu_mcan0 {
>  };
>  
>  &mcu_mcan1 {
> +	out-band-wakeup;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this face the same issue where the property is ignored by the kernel?

>  	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default>;
>  	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup>;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-smth-v1-0-e1738a38d58e@ti.com?part=4

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 22:08 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: ti: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-lp-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820221647.2A5861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=k-willis@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox