Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adam Skladowski" <a39.skl@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Motorola One
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:47:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821114703.8ABF51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-next-patches-v3-3-cd64bcef6e21@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Missing touchscreen device node despite being claimed as supported in the commit message.
- [Low] Invalid node names for 'regulator-fixed' devices failing schema validation.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Motorola One ---
commit 8ba9a47fea266dad9cdd80e285fa6a60029f2405
Author: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@gmail.com>

arm64: dts: qcom: Add Motorola One

Add a devicetree for the Motorola One smartphone, which is based
on the Jacala/MSM8953 SoC.

>     Supported functionality as of this initial submission:
>     * I2C peripherals (Touchscreen,NFC)

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions touchscreen support, but it appears the device
node is missing from the I2C buses in the device tree. Are the touchscreen
nodes missing from this submission?

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-motorola-deen.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-motorola-deen.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..66ecfab69c365
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-motorola-deen.dts
[ ... ]
> +	vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		regulator-name = "vph_pwr";
> +		regulator-always-on;
> +		regulator-boot-on;
> +	};
> +
> +	/* Fake VBUS 5V supply till we wire pmi8950 one */
> +	fusb302_vbus: otg-vbus {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";

[Severity: Low]
Will these node names cause dtbs_check warnings?

It looks like vph-pwr-regulator and otg-vbus do not match the required node
name pattern for fixed regulators in fixed-regulator.yaml. Should they
start with "regulator" to pass validation?

[ ... ]
> +&i2c_2 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c_3 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};

[Severity: Medium]
Are these I2C buses left empty because the intended touchscreen device node
is missing?

[ ... ]
> +	ts_int_default: ts-int-default-state {
> +		pins = "gpio65";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		drive-strength = <8>;
> +		bias-pull-up;
> +	};

[Severity: Medium]
Since the touchscreen device node seems to be missing, are these pinctrl
configurations currently unused?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821-next-patches-v3-0-cd64bcef6e21@gmail.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 11:36 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add 3 new devices Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add LeEco Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Motorola Moto One Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Motorola One Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document LeEco Le2 Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add " Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Xiaomi Redmi 9T Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add " Adam Skladowski
2026-08-21 11:46   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821114703.8ABF51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=a39.skl@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox