From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "George Moussalem" <george.moussalem@outlook.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: Flatten usb controller nodes
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:08:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825110855.D11AD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825-ipq-flatten-usb-v1-6-5c1f3170bbe9@outlook.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incorrect interrupt-names array order triggers dtbs_check failures.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: Flatten usb controller nodes ---
commit 7fc908a77a39f9104c77c013b5b7e44175c43038
Author: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@outlook.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: Flatten usb controller nodes
This patch flattens the USB controller nodes and updates them to use the
latest bindings and the flattened driver approach. It also adds a property
to select UTMI as the reference clock for the DWC3 core.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> index 702061e16a58d..648f95d70448e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> @@ -663,33 +660,32 @@ usb2: usb2@1ef8800 {
> assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>,
> <24000000>;
>
> - interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 395 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 396 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <&intc GIC_SPI 395 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 397 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 387 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 388 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> - interrupt-names = "pwr_event",
> + interrupt-names = "dwc_usb3",
> + "pwr_event",
> "qusb2_phy",
> "dm_hs_phy_irq",
> "dp_hs_phy_irq";
[Severity: Low]
Will this order of interrupt names cause dtbs_check failures with the new
schema?
The qcom,snps-dwc3.yaml schema requires the interrupts for
qcom,ipq5424-dwc3 to strictly follow the order: dwc_usb3, pwr_event,
qusb2_phy, dp_hs_phy_irq, and then dm_hs_phy_irq. Leaving
dm_hs_phy_irq before dp_hs_phy_irq seems like it might trigger a
validation error, even though the kernel matches them by name.
[ ... ]
> @@ -755,34 +747,33 @@ usb3: usb3@8af8800 {
> assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>,
> <24000000>;
>
> - interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 412 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 409 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <&intc GIC_SPI 412 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 414 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 423 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&intc GIC_SPI 424 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> - interrupt-names = "pwr_event",
> + interrupt-names = "dwc_usb3",
> + "pwr_event",
> "qusb2_phy",
> "dm_hs_phy_irq",
> "dp_hs_phy_irq";
[Severity: Low]
Does this also need to have dp_hs_phy_irq placed before dm_hs_phy_irq
to satisfy the qcom,snps-dwc3 dtbs_check requirements for this node?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825-ipq-flatten-usb-v1-0-5c1f3170bbe9@outlook.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 10:42 [PATCH 0/9] Flatten USB Controller Nodes on IPQ SoCs George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,snps-dwc3: Add ability to select UTMI as reference clock George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/9] usb: dwc3: core: Allow glue layer to pass " George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/9] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support for selecting UTMI as " George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 9:18 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-26 9:37 ` George Moussalem
2026-08-26 10:27 ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: Flatten usb controller node George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: " George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: Flatten usb controller nodes George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 11:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: " George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: " George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 10:42 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Flatten usb controller node George Moussalem via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825110855.D11AD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=george.moussalem@outlook.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox