From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yuanshen Cao" <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 01:43:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826014336.AAE3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826-sun60i-a733-dma-v4-5-dc2f745f40dc@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Missing mandatory function pointers in sun60i_a733_dma_cfg leads to unconditionally dereferencing NULL pointers during DMA preparation.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect physical channel indexing in the DMA interrupt handler maps interrupts for all registers to the first register's channels.
- [High] Missed interrupts due to integer division truncation in the DMA interrupt handler causes higher channel interrupts to be ignored.
--
commit 9fc6c319ac37c3c86b13dd65e2affac0589606b0
Author: Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller
Implement support for the Allwinner A733 DMA controller by defining
A733-specific register offsets, bitfield masks, and the
sun60i_a733_dma_cfg configuration structure.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> index b96d7d90f6b53..fb371b57d792a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1321,6 +1327,29 @@ static struct sun6i_dma_config sun50i_h6_dma_cfg = {
> SUN6I_DMA_IRQ_A31_COMMON_CFG
> };
>
> +/*
> + * The A733 binding uses the number of dma channels from the
> + * device tree node.
> + */
> +static struct sun6i_dma_config sun60i_a733_dma_cfg = {
> + .clock_autogate_enable = sun6i_enable_clock_autogate_h3,
> + .src_burst_lengths = BIT(1) | BIT(4) | BIT(8) | BIT(16),
> + .dst_burst_lengths = BIT(1) | BIT(4) | BIT(8) | BIT(16),
> + .src_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) |
> + BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES) |
> + BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES),
> + .dst_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) |
> + BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES) |
> + BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES),
> + .src_high_addr_mask = SRC_HIGH_ADDR_32G_MASK,
> + .dst_high_addr_mask = DST_HIGH_ADDR_32G_MASK,
> + .has_mbus_clk = true,
> + .irq_stride = DMA_IRQ_STRIDE_A733,
> + .irq_en_offset = DMA_IRQ_EN_OFFSET_A733,
> + .irq_stat_offset = DMA_IRQ_STAT_OFFSET_A733,
> + .num_channels_per_reg = DMA_IRQ_CHAN_NR_A733,
> +};
> +
[Severity: High]
Does sun60i_a733_dma_cfg omit the set_burst_length, set_drq, and set_mode
function pointers?
When sun6i_dma_prep_dma_memcpy(), sun6i_dma_prep_slave_sg(), or
sun6i_dma_prep_dma_cyclic() are called, they unconditionally invoke these
function pointers:
sdev->cfg->set_burst_length(&v_lli->cfg, burst, burst);
sdev->cfg->set_drq(&v_lli->cfg, DRQ_SDRAM, DRQ_SDRAM);
sdev->cfg->set_mode(&v_lli->cfg, LINEAR_MODE, LINEAR_MODE);
Could this result in a NULL pointer dereference on the A733 platform?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does setting num_channels_per_reg to 1 for
the A733 platform expose a physical channel indexing issue in
sun6i_dma_interrupt()?
When an interrupt occurs on a secondary IRQ register, sun6i_dma_interrupt()
reads the correct status register i, but calculates the physical channel
pointer as:
pchan = sdev->pchans + j;
Since it omits the i * sdev->cfg->num_channels_per_reg offset, hardware
interrupts for higher channels appear to be routed to lower channels. On
A733, this would map all channel interrupts to channel 0.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the loop bound in
sun6i_dma_interrupt() truncate due to integer division on platforms with
non-multiple channel counts?
for (i = 0; i < sdev->num_pchans / sdev->cfg->num_channels_per_reg; i++) {
status = sun6i_read_irq_stat(sdev, i);
If a platform has 12 physical channels and 8 channels per register (like H3),
the division evaluates to 1, causing the loop to only read interrupts for
channels 0-7 and ignore the final register. Could this cause transfers on the
highest channels to time out?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826-sun60i-a733-dma-v4-0-dc2f745f40dc@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 1:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Refactor to support A733 interrupt and register handling Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Support variable address widths using masks Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add num_channels_per_reg for flexible interrupt mapping Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: dmaengine: sun50i-a64-dma: Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma compatible string Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 1:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 16:26 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826014336.AAE3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.caoys@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox