From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yuanshen Cao" <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] dt-bindings: dmaengine: sun50i-a64-dma: Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma compatible string
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 02:57:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826025717.0BFB81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826-sun60i-a733-dma-v5-4-abc5229b441e@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Loop bounds calculation in `sun6i_dma_interrupt` truncates unaligned channel counts, causing interrupts for higher channels to be permanently missed.
- [High] Incorrect indexing of the physical channel array in `sun6i_dma_interrupt` maps status bits from subsequent interrupt registers to the wrong physical channels.
--
commit 42af4e68ee14f82cbb1311fbd3ef28760a3616bc
Author: Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
dt-bindings: dmaengine: sun50i-a64-dma: Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma compatible string
Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma to the list of compatible strings for the
sun50i-a64-dma dtbinding documentation.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma.yaml
> index c3e14eb6cfff9..1cc3304b74149 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma.yaml
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
> - allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma
> - allwinner,sun50i-a100-dma
> - allwinner,sun50i-h6-dma
> + - allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but adding a new compatible
string here might expose existing issues in the driver if the A733 DMA
controller uses unaligned channel counts or more than 8 channels.
Looking at sun6i_dma_interrupt() in drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c, does this loop
condition fail to round up unaligned channel counts?
drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c:sun6i_dma_interrupt() {
...
for (i = 0; i < sdev->num_pchans / sdev->cfg->num_channels_per_reg; i++) {
status = sun6i_read_irq_stat(sdev, i);
...
}
If a device tree specifies a dma-channels value that is not a multiple of
num_channels_per_reg (8), this loop bound evaluates incorrectly. For example,
with 12 channels, it evaluates to 1 instead of 2.
Will this cause interrupts for the trailing physical channels (e.g., 8-11)
to be permanently ignored, resulting in DMA transfers on those channels
hanging? This pattern was fixed with DIV_ROUND_UP in
sun6i_dma_dump_com_regs(), but appears to be missed here.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I also noticed a potential problem with how
the physical channel array is indexed in the inner loop of the same function:
drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c:sun6i_dma_interrupt() {
...
for (j = 0; (j < sdev->cfg->num_channels_per_reg) && status; j++) {
pchan = sdev->pchans + j;
...
}
Since this inner loop index 'j' is added directly to 'sdev->pchans' without
the '(i * sdev->cfg->num_channels_per_reg)' offset, will status bits from
subsequent interrupt registers (where i > 0) be mapped to the wrong physical
channels (0-7)?
Could this cause premature completion of DMA requests on low-numbered channels
while the actual high-numbered channels hang forever?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826-sun60i-a733-dma-v5-0-abc5229b441e@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 2:40 [PATCH v5 0/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Refactor to support A733 interrupt and register handling Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Support variable address widths using masks Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add num_channels_per_reg for flexible interrupt mapping Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] dt-bindings: dmaengine: sun50i-a64-dma: Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma compatible string Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Implement support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-08-26 2:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826025717.0BFB81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.caoys@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox