From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] leds: rgb: leds-group-multicolor: Implement default-intensity
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:56:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827165638.GH2943942@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaeb87f7-5a04-4592-ab59-b4114b005aab@gmx.net>
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 13.08.26 um 11:53 schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > > - [Medium] The `default-intensity` property read from individual monochromatic LED nodes is applied to the multicolor group without rescaling, causing incorrect brightness calculations.
> > Please review, explain or fix the Sashiko review(s).
> >
> > If this is a set, this request includes the other patches too.
> Sorry, I don't get the problem with "incorrect brightness calculation", I
> tought the intensity setting is independent from the brightness. Btw the
> intensity is applied to the monochromatic LED not to the group itself.
> hallucination?
>
> Does mixing PWM and GPIO LED in a RGB multicolor group make sense at all?
Couldn't honestly tell you without digging in myself.
I did just provide some concerns from Gemini though. PGTAL.
> > > --
> > >
> > > --- Patch [1]: [PATCH V4] leds: rgb: leds-group-multicolor: Implement default-intensity ---
> > > commit 13399f1aaceaf09afa7e252e35000d7d61ab1925
> > > Author: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
> > >
> > > leds: rgb: leds-group-multicolor: Implement default-intensity
> > >
> > > This commit introduces support for the default-intensity property during
> > > boot for LED multicolor groups. If the property is missing, the code falls
> > > back to the previous behavior of configuring the sub-LED intensity to its
> > > maximum.
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-group-multicolor.c b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-group-multicolor.c
> > > > --- a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-group-multicolor.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-group-multicolor.c
> > > > @@ -108,8 +108,10 @@ static int leds_gmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > subled[i].color_index = led_cdev->color;
> > > > - /* Configure the LED intensity to its maximum */
> > > > - subled[i].intensity = max_brightness;
> > > > + ret = device_property_read_u32(led_cdev->dev, "default-intensity",
> > > > + &subled[i].intensity);
> > > > + if (ret || subled[i].intensity > max_brightness)
> > > > + subled[i].intensity = max_brightness;
> > > [Severity: Medium]
> > > Does this logic properly scale the intensity when the individual LEDs in the
> > > group have different maximum brightness values?
> > >
> > > If a multicolor group consists of LEDs with vastly different maximum brightness
> > > capabilities (like a GPIO LED maxing at 1 and a PWM LED maxing at 255), the
> > > overall group max_brightness will evaluate to 255.
> > >
> > > When reading the default-intensity from the device tree, the value is typically
> > > specified on the scale of the individual sub-LED's max brightness. If this
> > > value is assigned directly to subled[i].intensity without being scaled up to
> > > the group's max_brightness, the sub-LED might be initialized with only a tiny
> > > fraction of its intended intensity, often resulting in the LED being completely
> > > unlit instead of at the requested intensity.
> > >
> > > > }
> > > > /* Initialise the multicolor's LED class device */
> > > --
> > > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813091428.9072-1-wahrenst@gmx.net?part=1
>
>
--
Lee Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 9:14 [PATCH V4] leds: rgb: leds-group-multicolor: Implement default-intensity Stefan Wahren
2026-08-13 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 9:53 ` Lee Jones
2026-08-13 10:50 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-27 16:56 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2026-08-27 17:03 ` Lee Jones
2026-08-27 16:55 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827165638.GH2943942@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jre@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox