From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krishna Kurapati" <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,snps-dwc3: Fix glymur binding for non-MP controllers
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:22:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828082249.40C9A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828081542.52796-1-krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Moving `qcom,glymur-dwc3` to a different `if-then` conditional block changes the positional requirements of the `interrupt-names` array, breaking ABI and schema validation for existing device trees.
--
commit 15d826b7f9c1b0ac7d9038a76e721573a86a768f
Author: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
dt-bindings: usb: qcom,snps-dwc3: Fix glymur binding for non-MP controllers
This commit modifies the device tree binding for the Glymur non-multiport
USB controllers to allow a maximum of 6 interrupts. It moves the compatible
string to a different conditional block to accommodate both hs_phy_irq and
ss_phy_irq.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260803-glymur-usb-binding-fixes-v1-1-9ce334777387@oss.qualcomm.com/
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,snps-dwc3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,snps-dwc3.yaml
> index ea60f7220afe3..3bef18f9557e1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,snps-dwc3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,snps-dwc3.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -547,6 +546,7 @@ allOf:
> contains:
> enum:
> - qcom,eliza-dwc3
> + - qcom,glymur-dwc3
[Severity: High]
Does moving this compatible string to the qcom,eliza-dwc3 conditional block
inadvertently break the device tree schema ABI for existing platforms?
The original qcom,milos-dwc3 block matched the baseline interrupt sequence
used by existing device trees, requiring dp_hs_phy_irq at index 2:
allOf / if block for qcom,milos-dwc3:
interrupt-names:
minItems: 4
items:
- const: dwc_usb3
- const: pwr_event
- const: dp_hs_phy_irq
The target qcom,eliza-dwc3 block imposes a different positional requirement,
expecting hs_phy_irq at index 2 and dp_hs_phy_irq at index 3:
allOf / if block for qcom,eliza-dwc3:
interrupt-names:
minItems: 5
items:
- const: dwc_usb3
- const: pwr_event
- const: hs_phy_irq
- const: dp_hs_phy_irq
Looking at existing configurations, such as usb_0 in
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi, the layout defines dp_hs_phy_irq
as the third interrupt:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi:usb_0 {
interrupt-names = "dwc_usb3",
"pwr_event",
"dp_hs_phy_irq",
"dm_hs_phy_irq",
"ss_phy_irq";
}
Since JSON schema arrays evaluate items positionally, won't this change
cause existing in-tree device trees to fail dtbs_check validation?
> - qcom,ipq4019-dwc3
> - qcom,ipq8064-dwc3
> - qcom,kaanapali-dwc3
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828081542.52796-1-krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 8:15 [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,snps-dwc3: Fix glymur binding for non-MP controllers Krishna Kurapati
2026-08-28 8:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828082249.40C9A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox