From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Cosmin Tanislav" <cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@renesas.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: claim direct mode on single reads
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 15:15:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828151508.598DB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828145943.2077589-5-cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@renesas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unsafe 1-jiffy hardware timeout causes spurious failures.
- [High] Late interrupt triggers spurious completion for subsequent reads on timeout.
--
commit 804ca0ac39c62632fae66702cb8c967efd8b7dee
Author: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@renesas.com>
iio: adc: rzt2h: claim direct mode on single reads
Claim direct mode around the single read to prevent it from conflicting
with an ongoing buffered read.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rzt2h_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rzt2h_adc.c
> index 995308a419f12..95bcebdc02cb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rzt2h_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rzt2h_adc.c
> @@ -158,8 +158,13 @@ static int rzt2h_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct rzt2h_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> switch (mask) {
> - case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
> + IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_DIRECT_MODE(indio_dev, claim);
> + if (IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_FAILED(claim))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> return rzt2h_adc_read_single(adc, chan->channel, val);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this is a pre-existing issue
in rzt2h_adc_read_single(). Can the 1-jiffy timeout expire instantaneously
and cause spurious failures?
Looking at rzt2h_adc_read_single():
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&adc->completion, usecs_to_jiffies(1));
if (!ret) {
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
goto disable;
}
A 1-jiffy timeout can expire almost instantaneously if the next timer tick
occurs immediately after the call. Even though the conversion takes ~0.32us,
could it be outraced by the timer tick, causing the driver to incorrectly assume
a hardware failure and abort the read?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does a timeout in rzt2h_adc_read_single()
leave a pending interrupt that could corrupt subsequent reads?
If a timeout occurs, the cleanup path calls rzt2h_adc_stop() to disable device
interrupts, but it does not synchronize with the IRQ controller. A pending or
concurrently running ISR will unconditionally signal completion:
static irqreturn_t rzt2h_adc_isr(int irq, void *private)
{
struct rzt2h_adc *adc = private;
complete(&adc->completion);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
If this late ISR executes immediately after a subsequent read calls
reinit_completion(), could the new read falsely complete instantly and return
stale or garbage data from the ADC before the hardware actually finishes?
> + }
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> *val = 1800;
> *val2 = 12;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828145943.2077589-1-cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@renesas.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 14:59 [PATCH 0/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: add DMA buffer support Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: remove unused struct rzt2h_adc::max_channels Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: store IRQ in private state Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: store the physical address " Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: claim direct mode on single reads Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 15:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: implement DMA buffer support Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-29 1:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-29 1:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] iio: adc: rzt2h: expose sampling frequency Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: renesas,r9a09g077-adc: document DMA support Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 16:21 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-28 17:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g077: Wire up DMA support for ADC Cosmin Tanislav
2026-08-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g087: " Cosmin Tanislav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828151508.598DB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@renesas.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox