From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ahmed Naseef" <naseefkm@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: airoha: limit GPIO interrupts to interrupt-capable pins
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 15:48:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828154845.2BF401F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420a5e385cf7204318cdc1cc86a99570162e9b35.1787931313.git.naseefkm@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The patch fails to properly bound the inner interrupt loop to `num_irq_pins`, leaving it vulnerable to falsely claiming shared interrupts.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free in the interrupt handler during device unbind due to incorrect devres registration order.
- [High] The interrupt handler unconditionally clears the status register after processing, creating a race condition that permanently drops edge interrupts.
--
commit a41a436d88572aa867cd2449961e1f380a5c1d31
Author: Ahmed Naseef <naseefkm@gmail.com>
pinctrl: airoha: limit GPIO interrupts to interrupt-capable pins
The driver assumes that every one of the AIROHA_NUM_PINS GPIOs can raise
an interrupt. That holds for the SoCs supported so far, but not for every
member of the family: on EN7528 only GPIO0-GPIO15 are wired to the
interrupt controller.
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c b/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c
> index f505a3f69c5d1..52a768c859b71 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -304,9 +307,11 @@ static irqreturn_t airoha_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl = data;
> bool handled = false;
> + unsigned int nbanks;
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_status_regs); i++) {
> + nbanks = DIV_ROUND_UP(pinctrl->num_irq_pins, AIROHA_PIN_BANK_SIZE);
> + for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++) {
> struct gpio_irq_chip *girq = &pinctrl->gpiochip.irq;
> u32 regmap;
> unsigned long status;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this fail to bound the inner interrupt loop if num_irq_pins is not a
multiple of 32?
If num_irq_pins is, for example, 16 for EN7528, the inner loop still iterates
up to 32:
drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c:airoha_irq_handler() {
...
status = regmap;
for_each_set_bit(irq, &status, AIROHA_PIN_BANK_SIZE) {
u32 offset = irq + i * AIROHA_PIN_BANK_SIZE;
generic_handle_domain_irq(girq->domain, offset);
...
}
If hardware sets any status bits beyond num_irq_pins (like raw floating GPIO
state), they will be processed. generic_handle_domain_irq() will return
-EINVAL but handled will be set to true, falsely claiming the interrupt.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this unconditional clear drop hardware
edge interrupts?
drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c:airoha_irq_handler() {
...
for_each_set_bit(irq, &status, AIROHA_PIN_BANK_SIZE) {
u32 offset = irq + i * AIROHA_PIN_BANK_SIZE;
generic_handle_domain_irq(girq->domain, offset);
regmap_write(pinctrl->regmap,
pinctrl->gpio_regs->status[i], BIT(irq));
}
...
}
When an edge interrupt occurs, generic_handle_domain_irq() correctly calls
the driver's .irq_ack callback to clear the latch before running the device
action handler.
If a new edge arrives during the action execution, the hardware latches it
again. However, when generic_handle_domain_irq() returns, the handler
unconditionally executes a redundant regmap_write() to clear the status bit a
second time, blindly wiping out any newly latched edge interrupt before it can
be processed.
[ ... ]
> @@ -362,6 +383,7 @@ static int airoha_pinctrl_add_gpiochip(struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl,
>
> girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> + girq->init_valid_mask = airoha_gpio_init_valid_mask;
> gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &airoha_gpio_irq_chip);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this devres registration order create a
use-after-free window during device unbind?
drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c:airoha_pinctrl_add_gpiochip() {
...
err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, airoha_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED,
dev_name(dev), pinctrl);
if (err)
return err;
return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, gc, pinctrl);
}
The driver registers the parent IRQ with devm_request_irq() before registering
the gpiochip. During unbind, devres runs in reverse, calling gpiochip_remove()
(which destroys and frees girq->domain) before calling free_irq().
Because IRQF_SHARED is used, the handler remains active on the shared line.
If a shared interrupt fires in this window, airoha_irq_handler() runs and
dereferences the freed girq->domain pointer in generic_handle_domain_irq().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787931313.git.naseefkm@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 15:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] pinctrl: airoha: add EcoNet EN7528 pin controller support Ahmed Naseef
2026-08-28 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: airoha: limit GPIO interrupts to interrupt-capable pins Ahmed Naseef
2026-08-28 15:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-28 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add EcoNet EN7528 pin controller Ahmed Naseef
2026-08-28 15:51 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-29 11:47 ` Ahmed Naseef
2026-08-28 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: airoha: add support of en7528 SoC Ahmed Naseef
2026-08-28 15:48 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828154845.2BF401F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naseefkm@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox