Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jan-Michael Brummer" <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	media-ci@linuxtv.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ak7375: Do not mark the VCM active before powering it
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 05:49:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260829054925.F18E41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260829052514.18178-4-jan.brummer@tabos.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] The commit message incorrectly attributes a regulator leak to `pm_runtime_idle()`, which is structurally impossible.

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Use-After-Free of `struct ak7375_device` on driver unbind due to `devm_kzalloc`.
--

commit a4a5fe00ce60666a1ebfccbdf63f44f93d436c10
Author: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>

media: i2c: ak7375: Do not mark the VCM active before powering it

This patch replaces pm_runtime_set_active() with pm_runtime_set_suspended()
in the probe function to correctly reflect that the regulators are initially
off. It also adds a call to disable the regulators in the resume error path
to prevent leaking an enable count.

> probe() calls pm_runtime_set_active() while the regulators are still
> off, so runtime PM believes a powered device is present.  The following
> pm_runtime_idle() runs the suspend path against an unpowered chip, which
> fails its I2C writes and then calls regulator_bulk_disable() on
> regulators that were never enabled - later tripping the enable/disable
> balance check in regulator_bulk_free() on unbind.

[Severity: Medium]
Is this description accurate?

Looking at ak7375_vcm_suspend(), it explicitly checks the active state and
returns early:

drivers/media/i2c/ak7375.c:ak7375_vcm_suspend() {
    ...
    if (!ak7375_dev->active)
        return 0;
    ...
}

Since ak7375_dev is zero-initialized by devm_kzalloc() during probe, active
is false. This means pm_runtime_idle() would never reach the I2C writes or
regulator_bulk_disable() during probe.

Could the actual leak have occurred strictly on the resume error path instead?

> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ak7375.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ak7375.c
> index 4f311c4c06ba0..2763bbed6cbd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ak7375.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ak7375.c
> @@ -235,9 +235,12 @@ static int ak7375_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto err_cleanup;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
> +	/*
> +	 * The regulators are off at this point, so the device is suspended,
> +	 * not active.
> +	 */
> +	pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev);
> -	pm_runtime_idle(&client->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this devres cleanup lead to a
use-after-free on driver unbind?

The ak7375_device structure is allocated with devm_kzalloc() earlier in
ak7375_probe(). If a user-space process holds the /dev/v4l-subdevX node open
and the driver is unbound (e.g., via sysfs), ak7375_remove() will complete
and trigger devres to free ak7375_device.

When the process later closes the file descriptor, the V4L2 core functions
(such as subdev_close calling sd->internal_ops->close) will dereference the
now-freed v4l2_subdev pointer.

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260829052514.18178-1-jan.brummer@tabos.org?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-29  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-29  5:25 [PATCH 0/3] media: ak7375: Add AK7377 support Jan-Michael Brummer
2026-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH] media: dt-bindings: ak7375: Add AK7377 Jan-Michael Brummer
2026-08-29  5:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 18:23   ` Rob Herring
2026-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] media: i2c: ak7375: Add support for the AK7377 Jan-Michael Brummer
2026-08-29  5:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ak7375: Do not mark the VCM active before powering it Jan-Michael Brummer
2026-08-29  5:49   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260829054925.F18E41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.brummer@tabos.org \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox