From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3F3288C96 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788034502; cv=none; b=btMrTzXbNgBY+Dueq7Jph1mZ3ma+Is4fZ4YKXnCmHTEJTUeoICqUeZpzvTT2yv3OO4GaNL4Tz+UNwaMVNGqK3e8+MbhVyZLQm3tES/2AcaohKPZTWiQFZBIiqXnvGkijmjzlinRoRuI7VoF3/j6pFOhs//PT/IbKkfrgDNwdrC0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788034502; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4+pKllXM3BFaV1ndWHNmBuZ4V+c3gm0CkRx3v4nIIo8=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=eiRtW6XG0vN2SHJLHKFJ7ZWwopfVdm8+PgnXHo53HawQU3EEUAAZlqDpaHGEgEEDCUBFeZEewxnrrBre6386PXmM5MW8fpXqXbXuFvpjWxogN9y4JEgFPEzDqrRTs/RZDGGx0au//ahMn6piflWlAqcXn1sr/9PZB6iVuBFFPbE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X8UMeXiI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X8UMeXiI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 796D31F000E9; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:15:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788034500; bh=Z9HSNJCOp0EkaUL1Ll5zvr9SQQscvbVTNrjXTlkBLZ8=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=X8UMeXiIAxoylA2bji2rjLpVXfzbyue/PJShZBX1wuo6LA/z1OF7FR9AvJm0ArHjQ wtDbPK6UsW63/IdR4DgGkAa3iIbfLV6dl790/lwasOs1Kyj0NCybzJkds1nAvJJFv6 piNR0+WbYbEGvFxG/4MwGnn03J+REgo8P4mAL3fM8OR5ehnzdo4qKmw8uEtjIkDMR3 swJd3oqEyJbUzEMyyg9C+bJreoW0KVSq7suiaYQGSkTcyV/l9KjU3djJGIMWN4dGFP WwQPVn6JJXN/OsbyZtcGh/mManb7xD2H4nGCiusTg7UPZ/wz+Fp+w0fVDBO/WRlIvp tC2PgzmY3um4A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add bindings for Novatek NT51021 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Nickolay Goppen" Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, conor+dt@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260829-qcom-novatek-nt51021-panels-v1-1-cc1ca61bd261@mainlining.org> References: <20260829-qcom-novatek-nt51021-panels-v1-0-cc1ca61bd261@mainlining.org> <20260829-qcom-novatek-nt51021-panels-v1-1-cc1ca61bd261@mainlining.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:14:59 +0000 Message-Id: <20260829201500.796D31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Medium] Commit message and schema description contradict the schema's co= mpatible list by claiming to only support 'boe,tv101wum-nx0' while silently= including 'boe,tv080wum-nx2'. - [Medium] The description for `reset-gpios` incorrectly specifies the pola= rity as '(active high)', which contradicts the example and typical panel re= set semantics. -- commit 4949971c710c300054975d637c238b42bc5c2c75 Author: Nickolay Goppen dt-bindings: display: panel: Add bindings for Novatek NT51021 This commit introduces device tree bindings for the Novatek NT51021 display driver IC. It explicitly states support is added for the BOE TV101WUM-NX0 WUXGA video mode panel. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt51= 021.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt51021.= yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..a3e4ed10e645d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt51021.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ [ ... ] > +description: | > + The NT51021 IC from Novatek is a generic DSI Panel IC used to drive dsi > + panels. > + Right now, support is added only for a BOE WUXGA LCD display panels wi= th a > + resolution of 1200x1920. They are video mode DSI panels. > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: panel-common.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + items: > + - enum: > + - boe,tv101wum-nx0 > + - boe,tv080wum-nx2 [Severity: Medium] The commit message and the schema description state that support is added only for the BOE TV101WUM-NX0 panel, but this adds boe,tv080wum-nx2 to the compatible list. Is this regression intended, or should the description and commit message be updated to reflect support for both panels? [ ... ] > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + reset-gpios: > + maxItems: 1 > + description: phandle of gpio for reset line - This should be 8mA, gp= io > + can be configured using mux, pinctrl, pinctrl-names (active high) [Severity: Medium] Could this description cause regressions for users configuring the reset line? The text explicitly specifies (active high) for the reset-gpios polarity, but typical panel semantics and the example block further down use active low: reset-gpios =3D <&tlmm 62 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; If users follow this text description instead of the example, could they drive the physical line incorrectly and prevent the panel from initializing? --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260829-qcom-novat= ek-nt51021-panels-v1-0-cc1ca61bd261@mainlining.org?part=3D1