From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdurrahman Hussain" <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/10] of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 01:45:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901014538.BBB2B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831-nh-of-alias-overlay-v7-2-02754604805a@nexthop.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Lock-free access to the global `of_aliases` pointer in `of_find_node_opts_by_path()` introduces a TOCTOU Use-After-Free race with dynamic overlay detachments.
--
commit e8d4ce869294e7247761b17acbbfb6ac98d74f68
Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications
This commit registers a reconfig notifier to mirror /aliases property changes
into aliases_lookup. The notifier chain covers changesets and overlays, matching
/aliases by name and root parent, and updates runtime-allocated entries.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1435675876-2159-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150630172131.D4E6CC4041A@trevor.secretlab.ca/ [2]
> The reference makes the lock-free
> of_node_get(of_aliases) in of_find_node_opts_by_path() safe: a reader
> that observes a non-NULL pointer observes a live node, and on DETACH
> the changeset holds its own references across the notifier so the put
> here cannot be the final one while readers still walk the node.
[Severity: High]
Is this description accurate?
If a thread calls of_find_node_opts_by_path() and is preempted immediately after
reading the of_aliases pointer but before calling of_node_get(), it could be
delayed arbitrarily.
If an overlay detachment completes concurrently, it drops the notifier's
reference and fully destroys the overlay changeset. When the preempted thread
resumes, wouldn't it call of_node_get() on freed memory?
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index f7aa14d90e501..23d9bb073d8b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
[ ... ]
> +static int of_aliases_reconfig_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
> +
> + /* of_aliases may still be NULL when an overlay creates the node */
> + if (!rd->dn || !of_node_is_aliases(rd->dn))
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&aliases_mutex);
> + switch (action) {
> + case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE:
> + if (!of_aliases)
> + of_aliases = of_node_get(rd->dn);
> + break;
> + case OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE:
> + if (of_aliases == rd->dn) {
> + of_aliases = NULL;
> + of_aliases_forget_all();
> + of_node_put(rd->dn);
[Severity: High]
Can this introduce a Use-After-Free race with dynamic overlay detachments?
This overlay detachment clears the global pointer and drops the reference.
As discussed above, a lock-free reader could be preempted in
of_find_node_opts_by_path() right before acquiring the reference:
aliases = of_node_get(of_aliases);
If the reader is delayed until after the overlay changeset is destroyed,
the node memory can be freed. Will the preempted thread then dereference
freed memory when it finally calls of_node_get()?
> + }
> + break;
> + case OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831-nh-of-alias-overlay-v7-0-02754604805a@nexthop.ai?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 1:29 [PATCH v7 00/10] of: teach overlay code to keep /aliases in sync Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] of: hold a reference on of_aliases during alias path resolution Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 23:17 ` Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] of/overlay: look up absolute target-paths absolutely Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] of/overlay: put property on deadprops only after changeset add succeeds Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] of/overlay: only treat a positive changeset id as registered Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 23:11 ` Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] of/overlay: don't leak fragment references when changeset init fails Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] of/overlay: don't create "//" paths for fragments targeting the root Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] of/overlay: return ERR_PTR from dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop() Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] of/overlay: rewrite /aliases path values to live-tree paths Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-09-01 1:29 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] of: unittest: cover /aliases updates from overlay apply/revert Abdurrahman Hussain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901014538.BBB2B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=abdurrahman@nexthop.ai \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox