Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu-Chun Lin" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO clock controller driver
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 07:41:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901074146.94ABC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901072446.2563145-11-eleanor.lin@realtek.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but there is a Preexisting Use-After-Free race condition on probe failure due to incorrect registration order.
--

commit b5c9e12f17852a162c80193126ca4d9d2d466a7f
Author: Cheng-Yu Lee <cylee12@realtek.com>

clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO clock controller driver

This commit adds support for the ISO domain clock controller on the Realtek
RTD1625 SoC. This controller manages clocks in the always-on power domain,
ensuring essential services remain functional. The driver acts as the parent
device and registers the reset controller as an auxiliary device.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtd1625-iso.c b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtd1625-iso.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..5c3e01f28730b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtd1625-iso.c

[ ... ]

> +static int rtd1625_iso_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	const struct rtk_clk_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!desc)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return rtk_clk_probe(pdev, desc);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does calling rtk_clk_probe
here expose a use-after-free race condition if probe fails later?

Looking at rtk_clk_probe in drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtk-common.c, the clock
provider is registered before the final initialization step:

	ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
					  desc->clk_data);
	if (ret)
		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add clock provider\n");

	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, (void *)desc);

	return rtk_reset_controller_register(dev, desc->aux_name, regmap);

If rtk_reset_controller_register fails due to a memory allocation error, the
probe function returns an error and the devres framework automatically frees
the regmap allocated earlier via devm_regmap_init_mmio.

Because the clock provider was already exposed to consumers via
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider, a concurrent probe on another CPU could acquire
the clock before the failure occurs. The static clk_hw structures retain the
pointer to the freed regmap.

If the consumer subsequently calls clk_prepare_enable, the CCF invokes the
clock operations, which could lead to a dereference of the freed regmap since
operations on orphaned clocks are not blocked.

Could this be prevented by deferring the clock provider registration in
rtk_clk_probe until after the reset controller is successfully registered?

> +}

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901072446.2563145-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  7:24 [PATCH v14 00/11] clk / reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 clock and reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 reset controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce common probe() Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] clk: realtek: Add support for phase locked loops (PLLs) Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] clk: realtek: Add support for gate clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] clk: realtek: Add support for mux clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-CRT clock controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO " Yu-Chun Lin
2026-09-01  7:41   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01  7:24 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] arm64: dts: realtek: Add clock support for RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901074146.94ABC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eleanor.lin@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox