Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alex Elder" <elder@riscstar.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: of: avoid allocations in of_pci_prop_compatible()
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 13:59:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904135954.696FA1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904134607.1856121-2-elder@riscstar.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The local variable `bufp` is incorrectly declared as `char` instead of `char *`. This truncates the stack array pointer `buf` to an 8-bit integer, leading to severe memory corruption and an immediate kernel panic during runtime.
- [Low] The local variable `i` is declared but never used after the patch.
--

commit 0153310b625600febac7ea5aec9fbd9871d0af03
Author: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>

PCI: of: avoid allocations in of_pci_prop_compatible()

This patch replaces dynamic allocations for three compatible strings with a
single stack-allocated buffer. This avoids subsequent kernel crashes where
allocation failures would unconditionally trigger strlen() during device tree
properties initialization.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/sashiko-reviews/a647bd56-7dc8-4fec-9d96-834622054cdf@riscstar.com

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of_property.c b/drivers/pci/of_property.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/of_property.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of_property.c
[ ... ]
>  static int of_pci_prop_compatible(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  				  struct of_changeset *ocs,
>  				  struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	const char *compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_NUM] = { 0 };
> +	char buf[PROP_COMPAT_NUM * PROP_SIZE] = { };
> +	char bufp = buf;

[Severity: High]
Does this incorrectly declare bufp as a single char instead of a pointer?
Assigning the array address buf to an 8-bit char truncates the memory address.

>  	int i, ret;

[Severity: Low]
Is the variable i still needed here? The loop that used it to free the
allocated strings was removed by this patch, which will leave this as an
unused variable and cause a compiler warning.

> -	compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_PCI_VVVV_DDDD] =
> -		kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pci%x,%x", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
> -	compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_PCICLASS_CCSSPP] =
> -		kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pciclass,%06x", pdev->class);
> -	compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_PCICLASS_CCSS] =
> -		kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pciclass,%04x", pdev->class >> 8);
> +	ret = snprintf(bufp, PROP_SIZE, "pci%x,%x", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);

[Severity: High]
Will this snprintf call trigger a kernel panic upon dereference? Because bufp
is truncated to an 8-bit integer, passing it as the output buffer pointer to
snprintf() will result in an out-of-bounds memory access (unmapped low-memory
dereference) when evaluated during system boot or PCI device enumeration.

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904134607.1856121-1-elder@riscstar.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 13:46 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: of: warn on bogus device_type property Alex Elder
2026-09-04 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: of: avoid allocations in of_pci_prop_compatible() Alex Elder
2026-09-04 13:59   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 14:04     ` Alex Elder
2026-09-04 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: of: drop the reg_num argument to of_pci_set_address() Alex Elder
2026-09-04 14:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: of: don't zero flags in of_pci_get_addr_flags() Alex Elder
2026-09-04 14:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: of: introduce of_pci_verify_node() Alex Elder
2026-09-04 14:09   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904135954.696FA1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=elder@riscstar.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox