From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of/irq: Fix device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent()
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:45:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907114514.44DB81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907112944.313618-2-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] of_msi_xlate() prematurely aborts device tree hierarchy traversal when msi_np is NULL.
--
commit d227a3bc08eef0cbb22a6f227edca082ac29a9b8
Author: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
of/irq: Fix device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent()
This patch prevents a device node reference count leak in
of_check_msi_parent(). It ensures that the msi_node reference is
only kept when the incoming node pointer is NULL.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260826113604.010C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
> index ec035367c9500..109c54f346479 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int of_check_msi_parent(struct device_node *dev_node, struct device_node
> if ((*msi_node && *msi_node != msi_spec.np) || msi_spec.args_count != 0)
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!ret) {
> + if (!ret && !*msi_node) {
> /* Return with a node reference held */
> *msi_node = msi_spec.np;
> return 0;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but could the traversal
loop in of_msi_xlate() prematurely abort when msi_np is NULL?
If a driver calls of_msi_xlate(dev, NULL, id) and the direct parent lacks an
msi-map property, of_map_msi_id() passes the NULL msi_np to of_map_id()
as filter_np:
drivers/of/base.c:of_map_id() {
...
map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
if (!map) {
if (filter_np)
return -ENODEV;
/* Otherwise, no map implies no translation */
arg->args[0] = id;
arg->args_count = 1;
return 0;
}
...
}
Because filter_np is NULL, it returns 0 instead of -ENODEV.
This translates to !of_map_msi_id(...) evaluating to true in the loop in
of_msi_xlate(), hitting the break statement:
drivers/of/irq.c:of_msi_xlate() {
...
for (parent_dev = dev; parent_dev; parent_dev = parent_dev->parent) {
struct of_phandle_args msi_spec = {};
if (!of_map_msi_id(parent_dev->of_node, id_in, msi_np, &msi_spec)) {
if (msi_spec.np) {
...
}
/* msi-map present but no match → stop walking */
break;
}
...
}
...
}
Will this cause the function to incorrectly terminate the loop on the very
first node, conflating an absent msi-map with a present but unmatched
msi-map, and failing to find the MSI mapping in ancestor nodes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907112944.313618-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] of/irq: msi-parent handling in of_msi_xlate() Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] of/irq: Fix device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent() Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 11:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 11:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] of/irq: Stop the MSI walk at the first msi-parent Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907114514.44DB81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox