Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:34:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907123459.B96191F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907122406.1862398-4-diederik@cknow-tech.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Missing 3.3V regulator for the 4G LTE M.2 B-key connector and incorrect assignment of a 5V regulator.
--

commit 5412bbe217132fabf745d86e1c28d6b071b41043
Author: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus

This commit introduces basic support for the FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus.
It highlights the hardware differences from the NanoPC-T6 LTS, such as the
addition of an M.2 B-key connector for a 4G LTE module.

Link: https://wiki.friendlyelec.com/wiki/index.php/NanoPC-T6_Plus
Link: https://wiki.friendlyelec.com/wiki/images/a/ad/NanoPC-T6_Plus_2511_SCH.pdf
Link: http://everest-semi.com/pdf/ES8389%20PB.pdf

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6-plus.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f23ac4bd9f167
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6-plus.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Thomas McKahan
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus";
> +	compatible = "friendlyarm,nanopc-t6-plus", "rockchip,rk3588";
> +
> +	codec_es_3v3: regulator-codec-es-3v3 {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +		regulator-name = "codec_es_3v3";
> +		vin-supply = <&vcc4v0_sys>;
> +	};
> +
> +	usb2_port_5v: regulator-usb2-port-5v {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		enable-active-high;
> +		gpio = <&gpio1 RK_PA4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&usb20_host_pwren_h_pin>;
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;

[Severity: Medium]
Is it correct to define this regulator with a 5V constraint?

This uses the exact GPIO (gpio1 RK_PA4) previously used for the removed USB hub
on the LTS board and retains the 5V constraint, whereas the new M.2 B-key slot
would typically need a 3.3V regulator instead.

> +		regulator-name = "usb2_port_5v";
> +		vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> +	};
> +};

[ ... ]

> +&u2phy2_host {
> +	phy-supply = <&usb2_port_5v>;

[Severity: Medium]
Could this assignment provide the wrong voltage to the 4G LTE module?

Assigning the 5V regulator to the USB PHY port that typically connects to the
4G LTE module's M.2 B-key slot incorrectly requests a 5V supply instead of the
required 3.3V. This could result in the module failing to receive power or
operating with incorrect regulator parameters.

> +};

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907122406.1862398-1-diederik@cknow-tech.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 12:22 [PATCH 0/3] Add support for FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus Diederik de Haas
2026-09-07 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add " Diederik de Haas
2026-09-07 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move sound cards to board files for NanoPC-T6 Diederik de Haas
2026-09-07 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for FriendlyElec NanoPC-T6 Plus Diederik de Haas
2026-09-07 12:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 14:12     ` Diederik de Haas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260907123459.B96191F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox