Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Remove gPTP control from WoL setup and restore
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:31:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910173141.DE23E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909173027.2201560-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Meaningful code and commit message mismatch leading to unintended PTP clock lifecycle.
--

commit d9a97079fb4ac0a52b7c3683f3c046c7743362d3
Author: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>

net: ethernet: ravb: Remove gPTP control from WoL setup and restore

This commit removes the explicit gPTP stop/start calls from the Wake-on-LAN
(WoL) suspend and resume paths. It asserts that opening and closing the
netdev already handles this clock control.

> As the ndev will always be closed and re-opened when
> suspending and resuming the system.

[Severity: Medium]
Is this assumption in the commit message accurate? Looking at ravb_suspend()
in drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c, it appears to bypass
ravb_close() entirely when WoL is enabled:

	if (priv->wol_enabled) {
		ret = ravb_wol_setup(ndev);
		rtnl_unlock();
		return ret;
	}

	ret = ravb_close(ndev);


> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -3182,9 +3182,6 @@ static int ravb_wol_setup(struct net_device *ndev)
>  	/* Enable MagicPacket */
>  	ravb_modify(ndev, ECMR, ECMR_MPDE, ECMR_MPDE);
>  
> -	if (priv->info->ccc_gac)
> -		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> -

[Severity: Medium]
Since ravb_close() is skipped for WoL suspend, does removing the explicit
ravb_ptp_stop() leave the gPTP clock running? 

It looks like this might introduce an unintended asymmetric lifecycle on
ccc_gac platforms, where the clock stays running during WoL suspend but is
then unregistered during resume when ravb_wol_restore() invokes ravb_close().

>  	return enable_irq_wake(priv->emac_irq);
>  }

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909173027.2201560-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 17:30 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] ravb: Add gPTP support for Gen4 Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Remove gPTP control from WoL setup and restore Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Move programming of gPTP timer interval Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Simplify gPTP start and stop Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Remove redundant argument to ravb_ptp_init() Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Propagate error from ptp_clock_register() Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Replace gPTP flags with callbacks Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add callback for gPTP probe Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add callback for gPTP clock index Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Add optional gPTP phandle for Gen4 Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add gPTP support " Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-10 17:31   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910173141.DE23E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox