From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 09:10:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912091027.691EA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911-ks8995-to-ksz8-v12-3-5c3422d0d72e@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The PHY soft reset loop in `ksz8_reset_switch` unconditionally issues a soft reset and polls for it to self-clear on all ports, including the CPU port which lacks an internal PHY. This risks causing a probe timeout on the KSZ8995XA if the reserved register latches the bit.
--
commit d45e85fe8d15053b235725e1e75c154fee3c35c3
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA
This commit adds support for the Microchip KSZ8995XA switch to the KSZ driver.
It introduces hardware detection, a dedicated PHY soft reset workaround for
this older switch, and configures the switch for its specific legacy features.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
> index 941ae9f66f70b..4acce01ca0631 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -253,7 +255,35 @@ static int ksz8463_reset_switch(struct ksz_device *dev)
>
> static int ksz8_reset_switch(struct ksz_device *dev)
> {
> - if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev)) {
> + if (ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev)) {
> + unsigned int port, reg, val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* The KSZ8995XA switch itself cannot be reset by software, but
> + * often boot loaders have fun with ports, so reset them. This
> + * reset bit is self-clearing.
> + */
> + for (port = 0; port < dev->info->port_cnt; port++) {
> + ret = ksz_prmw8(dev, port, REG_PORT_STATUS_3,
> + PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET,
> + PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Does this loop incorrectly include the MAC-only CPU port?
Since dev->info->port_cnt is 5 for the KSZ8995XA, this iterates over ports
0 through 4. Port 4 is the CPU port, which does not have an internal PHY.
Does writing PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET to REG_PORT_STATUS_3 on the CPU port write
to a reserved register?
> +
> + /* IEEE 802.3 allows up to 500 ms for a PHY reset. */
> + for (port = 0; port < dev->info->port_cnt; port++) {
> + reg = dev->dev_ops->get_port_addr(port, REG_PORT_STATUS_3);
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ksz_regmap_8(dev), reg, val,
> + !(val & PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET),
> + 1000, 600000);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Will this polling loop timeout on the CPU port if the hardware latches the
written bit?
Since the CPU port lacks the PHY logic to execute the reset and self-clear
the bit, it might hang indefinitely and fail the probe with -ETIMEDOUT.
Should this loop (and the write loop above) be restricted to
dev->phy_port_cnt instead of dev->info->port_cnt?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911-ks8995-to-ksz8-v12-0-5c3422d0d72e@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 9:09 [PATCH net-next v12 0/4] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for KSZ8995XA/KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-11 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next v12 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-11 11:43 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-11 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next v12 2/4] net: dsa: tag_ks8995: Add the KS8995 tag handling Linus Walleij
2026-09-11 11:46 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-11 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next v12 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-11 12:11 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-12 9:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next v12 4/4] net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260912091027.691EA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox