Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Elson Serrao" <elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: add per-path High-Speed PHY control
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 23:16:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912231650.375C71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912225301.3396556-4-elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] Early return in disable_eud skips PHY disablement, leaking High-Speed PHY resources.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling readl_poll_timeout from a hardirq handler sleeps in atomic context.
--

commit 895071c1614ba92a198085df0882e77e4e133a74
Author: Elson Serrao <elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com>

usb: misc: qcom_eud: add per-path High-Speed PHY control

EUD hardware can support multiple High-Speed USB paths, each routed
through its own PHY. This patch restructures the driver to implement
per-path PHY management, ensuring that the PHY for the currently selected
path is properly initialized and powered.

Reviewed-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Elson Serrao <elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c b/drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c
> index 25a6a8f110ec8..868725ad35e09 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -75,6 +135,8 @@ static int disable_eud(struct eud_chip *priv)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	writel(0, priv->base + EUD_REG_CSR_EUD_EN);
> +	eud_phy_disable(priv);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

[Severity: Medium]
Does this early return bypass the newly introduced PHY disablement on error?

If qcom_scm_io_writel() fails, the function returns early and skips
eud_phy_disable(priv). Will this leave the High-Speed PHY resources
initialized and powered on, leaking the hardware state?

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is it safe to call
readl_poll_timeout() from a hardirq handler?

When the EUD_INT_SAFE_MODE hardware interrupt fires, the primary hardirq
handler directly calls pet_eud():

drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c:handle_eud_irq() {
	...
	case EUD_INT_SAFE_MODE:
		pet_eud(chip);
		return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

Which then calls readl_poll_timeout() with a non-zero delay:

drivers/usb/misc/qcom_eud.c:pet_eud() {
	...
	ret = readl_poll_timeout(chip->base + EUD_REG_SW_ATTACH_DET,
				reg, (reg == 0), 1, 100);
	...
}

Since readl_poll_timeout() internally uses usleep_range() which sleeps,
can this cause a panic or deadlock by sleeping in an atomic context?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260912225301.3396556-1-elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-12 22:52 [PATCH v8 0/8] Improve Qualcomm EUD driver and platform support Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: eud: Add per-path child nodes for UTMI routing Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: add sysfs attribute for port selection Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: add per-path High-Speed PHY control Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: add per-path role switch support Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: improve enable_store API Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 22:52 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: add role-based EUD control Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 22:53 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] usb: misc: qcom_eud: fix virtual attach/detach event handling Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 22:53 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: Desribe EUD UTMI routing and connector mapping Elson Serrao
2026-09-12 23:11   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260912231650.375C71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=elson.serrao@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox