From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800F74BEE5E for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789281069; cv=none; b=Ocibb3nsJF0YsywtaQYwqaBV9u0hiSe1t0rULOLRjCHr2904uZ9RDMXd4leNk6Km0qF+Fq2njjX8/NCCEtW2TfnjlypPyYrL0U/aRMVmLbebpdwzn7VSZ43yjTJNt2mP9IHBCqsEbCR85EZZx5J739WRHs1bFP7E0q6hlvpZf3E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789281069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XNqoDi8GI6eE5CBlp5NDP5H7YIhJjWn0NcRjIzIyyWk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=lEFuzZDi2qJVY+RlWx9mqbaUyaAXQT4hD0Df1//e8i20oDBpAUCILzNhyccdBBpi5AE3xaKK8mvOzz6KDa7zh8ubT3BxIvUZB45UvjBfjnzX8Zg9EMPlEXvhog7kas6UsWQzn4EFTeehK1ZXlMpS6AqIruFW7EcbDfFvwo+FipM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eb0GvKTr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eb0GvKTr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83681F00893; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:31:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789281068; bh=xAwViQErcoj/iSttbbspJZcrpFedxAxEGKzSOirtOkE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=eb0GvKTrK6JzGGFT6T639FISDQIWxwijFAHO7rxs60EO2H604Dt47YyIzbCpa4sd1 JsvyWir7dtH7h3uL15D4teeD0UXjN5uVf7cavJjDPF62oQxHDDjStnTzPn2YlHU3je Js5AWPF+pFYRKFjRj7i/5mQEzr12twUvd2IHVeALz/iVwhI4oLSBa4u3MCV1EcAztO I48pp/5sv8s4EjhqkxyWgoH7MRuIk9VIFmB4mt7SfsU9jGicij8DFZlMU4F7i+yOto 77sMckRL0KxeQu/REbLlFdmL6YZr7lavHaYnHxQpxyHXUpEbfp5y2KAVxSBfc7Act+ l8z2tZjnSjpZA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Alexey Minnekhanov" Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: <20260913-nt36672a-panels-v1-2-ce097402c6ea@minlexx.ru> References: <20260913-nt36672a-panels-v1-0-ce097402c6ea@minlexx.ru> <20260913-nt36672a-panels-v1-2-ce097402c6ea@minlexx.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:31:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20260913063107.D83681F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Low] Vendor prefix mismatch: 'shenchao' mapped to 'Shenzhen Zhuohong Ele= ctronic Technology Co., Ltd.' -- commit 73f96d396aaa9d9d8dc1a660e32b98910c8690b8 Author: Alexey Minnekhanov dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic This commit adds a new vendor prefix to the device tree bindings. It aims to register Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD/IPS displays. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Doc= umentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > @@ -1507,6 +1507,8 @@ patternProperties: > description: SGX Sensortech > "^sharp,.*": > description: Sharp Corporation > + "^shenchao,.*": > + description: Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. [Severity: Low] Is this vendor prefix mapped to the correct company description? The patch introduces the 'shenchao' prefix, but maps it to Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Since 'shenchao' typically refers to a Shenchao panel (as seen in a subsequent commit introducing the 'shenchao,fhdplus-video' panel), mapping it to Zhuohong, a different panel manufacturer, could cause confusion for device tree authors. Should this prefix be named something like '^zhuohong,.*' instead to match the manufacturer, or should the description be updated to reflect the actual Shenchao company name? --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913-nt36672a-p= anels-v1-0-ce097402c6ea@minlexx.ru?part=3D2