Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Louis-Alexis Eyraud" <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 23/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:25:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914132530.A2E761F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-23-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Clock scaling state is updated unconditionally even if clock operations fail, and partial reparenting is not reverted.
--

commit 42aaaa81d59b5f138bb60c0e81306845236f3259
Author: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>

scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"

The MediaTek UFS driver contains support for an undocumented,
non-vendor-prefixed u32 property named "clk-scale-up-vcore-min".
Since it is not part of any binding, this patch removes it.

> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> index 2ebf7a3118dab..ef8924704c902 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2000,14 +1976,6 @@ static void _ufs_mtk_clk_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (scale_up) {
> -		if (clk_bind_vcore) {
> -			ret = regulator_set_voltage(host->reg_vcore, volt, INT_MAX);
> -			if (ret) {
> -				dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to set vcore to %d\n", volt);
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
>  		ret = clk_set_parent(clki->clk, mclk->ufs_sel_max_clki->clk);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to set clock mux: %pe\n",
>  				__func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
>  			goto out;
>  		}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that if clk_set_parent() succeeds
here, but the subsequent reparenting for fde_clki->clk fails, the function
jumps to the cleanup block without reverting this successful parent switch:

		if (clk_fde_scale) {
			ret = clk_set_parent(fde_clki->clk, mclk->ufs_fde_max_clki->clk);
			if (ret) {
				dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to set fde clock mux: %pe\n",
					__func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
				goto out;
			}
		}

Because _ufs_mtk_clk_scale() returns void, the caller ufs_mtk_clk_scale() has
no way to know that the hardware operations partially failed, and it
unconditionally updates the software state anyway:

drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:ufs_mtk_clk_scale() {
    ...
	_ufs_mtk_clk_scale(hba, scale_up);

	host->clk_scale_up = scale_up;

	/* Must always set before clk_set_rate() */
	if (scale_up)
		clki->curr_freq = clki->max_freq;
	else
		clki->curr_freq = clki->min_freq;
    ...
}

Will this permanently desynchronize the hardware and software states if clock
reparenting fails, leaving the UFS controller in a broken mixed-clock state
where future scaling requests are ignored?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-0-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com?part=23

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14 11:38 [PATCH v12 00/24] MediaTek UFS Cleanup and MT8196 Enablement Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 01/24] dt-bindings: phy: Add mediatek,mt8196-ufsphy variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 02/24] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Complete the binding Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:04   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-24 15:26   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 03/24] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:04   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-24 15:27   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 04/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Move MTK_SIP_UFS_CONTROL to mtk_sip_svc.h Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 05/24] phy: mediatek: ufs: Add support for resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 06/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 07/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework 0.9V regulator Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 08/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add dual 0.9V supply support Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:02   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14 12:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 09/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 10/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the crypt-boost stuff Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Handle misc host voltage regulators Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 12/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented downstream reset cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 13/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 14/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Use the common PHY framework Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 15/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove mediatek,ufs-broken-rtc property Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 16/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework _ufs_mtk_clk_scale error paths Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 17/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Clean up logging prints Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 18/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework ufs_mtk_wait_idle_state Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 19/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Don't acquire dvfsrc-vcore twice Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 20/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework hardware version reading Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 21/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Back up idle timer in per-instance struct Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 22/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove ret local from link_startup_notify Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 23/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min" Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 24/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add MT8196 compatible, update copyright Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:41   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260914132530.A2E761F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox