From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Louis-Alexis Eyraud" <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 23/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914132530.A2E761F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-23-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Clock scaling state is updated unconditionally even if clock operations fail, and partial reparenting is not reverted.
--
commit 42aaaa81d59b5f138bb60c0e81306845236f3259
Author: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
The MediaTek UFS driver contains support for an undocumented,
non-vendor-prefixed u32 property named "clk-scale-up-vcore-min".
Since it is not part of any binding, this patch removes it.
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> index 2ebf7a3118dab..ef8924704c902 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2000,14 +1976,6 @@ static void _ufs_mtk_clk_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
> }
>
> if (scale_up) {
> - if (clk_bind_vcore) {
> - ret = regulator_set_voltage(host->reg_vcore, volt, INT_MAX);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to set vcore to %d\n", volt);
> - goto out;
> - }
> - }
> -
> ret = clk_set_parent(clki->clk, mclk->ufs_sel_max_clki->clk);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to set clock mux: %pe\n",
> __func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
> goto out;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that if clk_set_parent() succeeds
here, but the subsequent reparenting for fde_clki->clk fails, the function
jumps to the cleanup block without reverting this successful parent switch:
if (clk_fde_scale) {
ret = clk_set_parent(fde_clki->clk, mclk->ufs_fde_max_clki->clk);
if (ret) {
dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to set fde clock mux: %pe\n",
__func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
goto out;
}
}
Because _ufs_mtk_clk_scale() returns void, the caller ufs_mtk_clk_scale() has
no way to know that the hardware operations partially failed, and it
unconditionally updates the software state anyway:
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:ufs_mtk_clk_scale() {
...
_ufs_mtk_clk_scale(hba, scale_up);
host->clk_scale_up = scale_up;
/* Must always set before clk_set_rate() */
if (scale_up)
clki->curr_freq = clki->max_freq;
else
clki->curr_freq = clki->min_freq;
...
}
Will this permanently desynchronize the hardware and software states if clock
reparenting fails, leaving the UFS controller in a broken mixed-clock state
where future scaling requests are ignored?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-0-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com?part=23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 11:38 [PATCH v12 00/24] MediaTek UFS Cleanup and MT8196 Enablement Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 01/24] dt-bindings: phy: Add mediatek,mt8196-ufsphy variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 02/24] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Complete the binding Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:04 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-24 15:26 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 03/24] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:04 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-24 15:27 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 04/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Move MTK_SIP_UFS_CONTROL to mtk_sip_svc.h Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 05/24] phy: mediatek: ufs: Add support for resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 06/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 07/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework 0.9V regulator Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 08/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add dual 0.9V supply support Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:02 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14 12:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 09/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 10/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the crypt-boost stuff Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Handle misc host voltage regulators Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 12/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented downstream reset cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:38 ` [PATCH v12 13/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 14/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Use the common PHY framework Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 15/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove mediatek,ufs-broken-rtc property Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 12:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 16/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework _ufs_mtk_clk_scale error paths Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 17/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Clean up logging prints Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 18/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework ufs_mtk_wait_idle_state Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 19/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Don't acquire dvfsrc-vcore twice Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 20/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework hardware version reading Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 21/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Back up idle timer in per-instance struct Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 22/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove ret local from link_startup_notify Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 23/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min" Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v12 24/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add MT8196 compatible, update copyright Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-09-14 13:41 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914132530.A2E761F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox