Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v51 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:27:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914142754.70A2B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915-imx-se-if-v51-1-4a7dac612cb5@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Artificially intercepting a successfully completed firmware command to return `-EINTR` leads to firmware resource leaks and violates standard syscall semantics.
--

commit 08f44ced154dcd881139680cedb3ca1074757a26
Author: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>

    Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces
    
    Documents i.MX SoC's Service layer and C_DEV driver for selected SoC(s)
    that contains the NXP hardware IP(s) for Secure Enclaves(se) like:
    - NXP EdgeLock Enclave on i.MX93 & i.MX8ULP

> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> index 06ac89adaafba..984ee3ecc8dc2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst

[ ... ]

> +      |            [fw_api_specific_ops()         |
> +      |             (is_cmd_interrupted=true):    |
> +      |             for SESSION_OPEN: record      |
> +      |             handle, close session via     |
> +      |             se_close_session(), clear;    |
> +      |             for STORAGE_OPEN: record      |
> +      |             handle, close storage via     |
> +      |             se_close_storage(), return 0] |
> +      |            err = -EINTR                   |
> +      |            (not -ERESTARTSYS:             |
> +      |             prevents VFS auto-restart)    |
> +      |<--ioctl -EINTR-----|                      |
> +      |                    |                      |
> +      | [signal handler runs; userspace decides   |
> +      |  whether to re-issue; FW handle tracked   |
> +      |  or cleaned up; no firmware resource leak]|

[Severity: High]
Does this behavior leak firmware resources for commands other than SESSION_OPEN
and STORAGE_OPEN?

If a non-fatal signal is delivered during the ioctl wait for operations like
ELE_MAC_OPEN_REQ, ele_msg_send_rcv() overrides the successful result with
-ERESTARTSYS.

Then se_ioctl_cmd_snd_rcv_rsp_handler() catches this, calls
fw_api_specific_ops(is_cmd_interrupted=true), and returns -EINTR.

However, fw_api_specific_ops() only implements rollback for session and
storage handles:

ele_fw_api.c:fw_api_specific_ops() {
    ...
    switch (header->command) {
    case ELE_SESSION_OPEN_REQ:
        ...
    case ELE_STORAGE_OPEN_REQ:
        ...
    }
}

This silently ignores and leaks all other handle-creating operations.

Because -EINTR is returned, the response containing the handle is not copied
to userspace. This permanently leaks the resource in the secure enclave, and
could allow unprivileged users to cause a denial of service by sending
signals to their own process during ioctls.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260915-imx-se-if-v51-0-4a7dac612cb5@nxp.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14 19:39 [PATCH v51 0/7] firmware: imx: driver for NXP secure-enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:39 ` [PATCH v51 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 14:27   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-14 19:39 ` [PATCH v51 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 3/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 5/7] firmware: imx: adds miscdev pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 15:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 17:34     ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-09-16 13:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-16 14:39     ` Frank Li
2026-10-05 14:28       ` Frieder Schrempf
2026-09-24 16:14     ` [EXT] " Pankaj Gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 15:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add reserved memory for EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260914142754.70A2B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox