From: Henrik Grimler <henrik.grimler@axis.com>
To: Ryan Brue <ryanbrue.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: supply: battery: allow longer ocv-capacity tables
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:29:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918082921.GA1515928@pc67698-2615.sto.se.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-rbrue-suez-upstreaming-battery-ocv-table-128-v1-1-f477ef39ef0d@gmail.com>
Hi Ryan,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:36:31AM -0500, Ryan Brue wrote:
> ocv-capacity-table-N has been capped at 100 points since battery.txt was
> converted to YAML, where the limit arrived without a stated reason.
>
> The MT6397 fuel gauge is characterised per temperature by a table the
> Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017) vendor device tree carries with 126 points, of
> which 122 are expressible here - the remainder are greater than 100%
> discharged, so the binding excludes those points. Boards carrying this
> PMIC fuel gauge would need more than 100 points to describe the pack with
> the generic property. Raise the cap to 128.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Brue <ryanbrue.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> No kernel change goes with this. power_supply_get_battery_info() sizes each
> ocv-capacity-table-N from the property itself -- it reads the length with
> fwnode_property_count_u32() and devm_kcalloc()s that many entries -- so
> maxItems in the binding is the only cap on points per table.
> POWER_SUPPLY_OCV_TEMP_MAX bounds the number of tables, not their length.
>
> The consumer that wants this is an MT6397 PMIC fuel gauge not yet posted;
> its pack is characterised at 126 points per temperature in the vendor's
> kernel (Amazon Fire OS, based on Linux 3.18), with 122 of those points
> being expressible with the generic property (the rest are greater than
> 100%).
Allowing for points > 100 % could make sense, but why would you need
122 points up to 100 %? If the vendor kernel has several values at for
example 20 %, then a better solution is probably to take the average
of them.
I think only reason to have multiple values for the same percentage
would be if hysterersis (see for example this open-access article [1]
for discussion about hysteresis) is taken into account, i.e. having
one table for charge direction, and one table for discharge direction,
but I don't think any driver uses multiple tables to handle something
like that.
[1] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51474-5
Best regards,
Henrik Grimler
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/battery.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/battery.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/battery.yaml
> index 8ebf05d9497c..a6d4822f591c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/battery.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/battery.yaml
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ patternProperties:
> of the battery and corresponding battery capacity percent, which is used
> to look up battery capacity according to current OCV value. And the open
> circuit voltage unit is microvolt.
> - maxItems: 100
> + maxItems: 128
> items:
> items:
> - description: open circuit voltage (OCV) in microvolts
>
> ---
> base-commit: fd73f4a6659897191fa0d40695fe370925dd3780
> change-id: 20260917-rbrue-suez-upstreaming-battery-ocv-table-128-9ba83f9313bb
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Ryan Brue <ryanbrue.dev@gmail.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 5:36 [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: supply: battery: allow longer ocv-capacity tables Ryan Brue
2026-09-18 8:29 ` Henrik Grimler [this message]
2026-09-20 6:42 ` Ryan Brue
2026-09-22 6:51 ` Henrik Grimler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918082921.GA1515928@pc67698-2615.sto.se.axis.com \
--to=henrik.grimler@axis.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryanbrue.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox