From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: panel: Add JDI NT35596S
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:03:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922-stress-creole-094d9e68fe6a@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921233127.C2F1E1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2017 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 11:31:27PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] dt-bindings: incorrect use of additionalProperties instead of unevaluatedProperties
> --
>
> commit e0dc4d49c687f6d5568ce2c31031086acb6cd5e6
> Author: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>
> dt-bindings: panel: Add JDI NT35596S
>
> This commit adds a new device tree binding schema for the JDI FHD
> NT35596S MIPI-DSI panel. It documents properties such as the DSI reg value,
> reset GPIO, backlight, port, and various power supplies.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jdi,fhd-nt35596s.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jdi,fhd-nt35596s.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..aefc9ae5d8abd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jdi,fhd-nt35596s.yaml
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: jdi,fhd-nt35596s
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - reset-gpios
> > + - vddio-supply
> > + - vddneg-supply
> > + - vddpos-supply
> > + - port
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Does the use of additionalProperties: false here incorrectly reject standard
> inherited panel properties?
>
> Because this schema references panel-common.yaml in an allOf block,
> additionalProperties does not traverse the $ref references. This blocks
> standard properties like rotation and forces the redundant declaration of
> properties like backlight, reset-gpios, and port just to pass static JSON
> schema validation during a make dt_binding_check.
>
> Should this use unevaluatedProperties: false instead?
This seems to be the new thing that Sashiko whines about, any binding I
see with additionalProperties: false seems to get complained about.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 23:26 [PATCH] dt-bindings: panel: Add JDI NT35596S Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-21 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 18:03 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-09-23 15:07 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922-stress-creole-094d9e68fe6a@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox