Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Judith Mendez" <jm@ti.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: Add k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi for AM62PX efuse GP_SW1
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:08:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922170807.AC76C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922165714.425576-1-jm@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] dt-bindings: invalid fallback compatible causes bus fault on AM62P WKUP_CTRL_MMR
--

commit b27457a62deb29b29e55d04f2bdab0cbcd3ef0cd
Author: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Subject: arm64: dts: ti: Add k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi for AM62PX efuse GP_SW1

This commit creates a new device tree include file for AM62P WAKEUP domain
peripherals. It adds an efuse node for the GP_SW1 register, which will be
used to determine the AM62P silicon revision.

Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915001304.3781247-1-jm@ti.com/

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..c56fb3890c983
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
[ ... ]
> +&wkup_conf {
> +	gpsw_efuse: efuse@230 {
> +		compatible = "ti,am62p-efuse", "socionext,uniphier-efuse";

[Severity: High]
Does this fallback compatible cause a bus fault on boot?

The ti,am654-chipid driver probes and calls nvmem_cell_read_u32() for the
gpsw1 cell, which delegates the read to the NVMEM provider. By using
"socionext,uniphier-efuse" as a fallback, the driver in
drivers/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.c is bound. That driver sets word_size = 1 and
uses a byte-wise readb() loop in uniphier_reg_read().

Because the efuse@230 node is in the TI K3 WKUP_CTRL_MMR space, it strictly
requires 32-bit aligned accesses (readl()). The 8-bit accesses performed by
the Uniphier driver violate this hardware invariant and cause a Synchronous
External Abort during boot.

Also, is it acceptable to piggyback on an unrelated vendor's IP compatible
string just to bind a generic NVMEM driver?

> +		reg = <0x230 0x10>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922165714.425576-1-jm@ti.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 16:57 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: Add k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi for AM62PX efuse GP_SW1 Judith Mendez
2026-09-22 17:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-05 15:44 ` Moteen Shah
2026-10-05 22:33   ` Judith Mendez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922170807.AC76C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox